Understanding the Mechanisms of Collective Decision Making in Ecological Restoration: An Agent-Based Model of Actors and Organizations

Abstract

ABSTRACT. Ecological restoration, particularly in urban contexts, is a complex collective decision-making process that involves a diversity of stakeholders and experts, each with their own perceptions and preferences about what landscapes should and can look like, how to get them to the desired state, and on what timeline. We investigate how structural and behavioral factors may influence collective decision making in the context of ecological restoration, with the purpose of establishing general relationships between management styles (defined by structural and behavioral factors of the organization) and decision outcomes. Informed by existing literature on collective decision making and by empirical data from the Chicago Wilderness region, we present a stylized agent-based model that maps out and simulates the processes by which individuals within restoration organizations communicate, discuss, and ultimately make a decision. Our study examines how structural and behavioral characteristicsincluding: (a) the number of actors and groups involved in decision making, (b) the frequency and type of interactions among actors, (c) the initial setup of positions and respect, (d) outside information, and (e) entrenchment and cost of dissent-lead to or prohibit group convergence in terms of collective position, variation in position across actors, and final decision strategies. We found that formal meetings and group leaders are important facilitators of convergence, especially when multiple groups are present, new information is introduced in the process, and participants are polarized around an issue. Also, intergroup interactions are particularly important for overall convergence. Position entrenchment slows the convergence process and increases the need for decision strategies involving outside intervention. Cost of dissent can reinforce these effects. Our study formalizes collective decision-making processes within the context of ecological restoration, establishes generalizable relationships between these processes and decision outcomes, and provides a foundation for further empirical and modeling research.

People Don't Talk in Institutional Statements: A Methodological Case Study of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework

“…Our assessment of the institutional statements was useful in refining agentbased models of reaching consensus (Watkins et al, 2013;Zellner et al, 2014), and this points to a next step for application of the IAD and ADICO: apply it to addressing problems in real time. Pre/post interventional studies based on an in-depth understanding of institutional statements-in-use in a given social-ecological system could go a long way to help understand both the usefulness the ADICO grammar, and also provide solutions for problems faced in the real world.…”

“…We were able to use the aggregation and information statements, and the patterns they highlighted, in our agent-based models. With these models, we were able to test how inserting an institutional statement (or suite of related statements) into a different system might affect the decision-making process in this other group (Watkins, Massey, Brooks, Ross, & Zellner, 2013;Zellner et al, 2014).…”

Multi-Agent Based Simulation of Environmental Pollution Issues: A Review

“…The decision-making in this case is a very complex task. In [18] a MAS is designed in order to understand the process of decision-making in ecological restoration. The model is a set of agents in form of hierarchies and groups.…”

Adaptive management in crop pest control in the face of climate variability: an agent-based modeling approach

“…In ABM, agents are heterogeneous and autonomous entities that interact with one another, which is suitable to explicitly represent the complexity of decision making (Watkins et al 2013). Thus, ABMs make it possible to formalize and test hypotheses about the conditions under which complex patterns in management practices can emerge from a set of observed behavior-response functions (Zellner 2008, Rounsevell et al 2012.…”

“…Thus, ABMs make it possible to formalize and test hypotheses about the conditions under which complex patterns in management practices can emerge from a set of observed behavior-response functions (Zellner 2008, Rounsevell et al 2012. ABMs have been applied to a variety of situations over the last 20 to 30 years, such as systems affected by land use and changes in land cover (e.g., Parker et al 2003, Matthews et al 2007) and resource management and conservation (e.g., Boone et al 2011, Parrott et al 2012, Watkins et al 2013. Although a few studies have focused on agricultural systems (e.g., Berger 2001, Happe et al 2006, Here, we assessed the impacts of climatic and economic variability on farmers' adaptive management in agricultural pest control in the Ecuadorian Andes.…”