2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2016.07.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the Light-induced Lifetime Degradation and Regeneration in Multicrystalline Silicon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
25
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
5
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, cobalt is known to form two recombination centers in silicon: one with an electron‐to‐hole capture cross‐section ratio of k = 0.15 and the other one with a value of k = 16 . The second value fits well with our previously published lifetime spectroscopy results, where we determined an electron‐to‐hole capture cross‐section ratio of the light‐induced defect in mc‐Si of k = 20 ± 7 . Hence, our experimental results indicate that cobalt is a very strong candidate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In particular, cobalt is known to form two recombination centers in silicon: one with an electron‐to‐hole capture cross‐section ratio of k = 0.15 and the other one with a value of k = 16 . The second value fits well with our previously published lifetime spectroscopy results, where we determined an electron‐to‐hole capture cross‐section ratio of the light‐induced defect in mc‐Si of k = 20 ± 7 . Hence, our experimental results indicate that cobalt is a very strong candidate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…14 The found Q-factor is, however, similar to findings for a form of LID observed in multicrystalline silicon. 15 Recent results indicate the same effect to also occur in Czochralski grown silicon 16 under similar conditions to those tested in this work.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Either way, defect formation or activation could be related to an interaction with hydrogen followed by its detachment and binding in sinks or a reconfiguration of the defect that causes the lifetime recovery. The insights gathered from our experiments cannot yet confirm or discard whether the degradation is caused by the same defects that are responsible for LID of multicrystalline 15 and Czochralski grown silicon. 16 It should be noted that the lateral inhomogeneities observed by PL imaging obstruct a detailed kinetic analysis of the measured progressions of s eff without an in-depth analysis beyond the scope of this work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Furthermore, several other studies [29][30][31][32] have consistently reported that the magnitude of LeTID increases with peak firing temperature, with peak temperatures 650 C leading to little or no LeTID, while temperatures between 700 C and 950 C trigger degradation. These trends in degradation behaviour with firing temperature and cooling rate correlate well with the present study.…”
Section: à3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, an increase in non-BO related LID has been observed in Cz silicon at peak firing temperatures above $650 C. 33,35 While such effects have been attributed to LeTID, 36,37 the possibility of Cu-LID being responsible for such LID effects has not been specifically precluded in such studies. It must be noted that there exist other empirical differences between LeTID and Cu-LID (e.g., SRH properties 29,38,39 and activation energy of degradation 31,38 ). However, Cu concentrations as low as 10 10 cm À3 have been shown to induce Cu-LID, 40 although the threshold concentration depends on the substrate quality.…”
Section: à3mentioning
confidence: 99%