2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/hicss.2016.337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Public Sector Collaboration Through Boundary Object Theory: A Case Study of an E-Government Initiative in Sweden

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, there is a need for a legal framework to regulate mobile transactions (Al-Hujran, 2012) and for tackling the risk of publishing personal information. One possible solution is based on the unique identification of mobile devices, thereby enabling replies to be sent to citizens without providing personal information (Lönn et al., 2016).…”
Section: Discussion Of Findings Implications and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there is a need for a legal framework to regulate mobile transactions (Al-Hujran, 2012) and for tackling the risk of publishing personal information. One possible solution is based on the unique identification of mobile devices, thereby enabling replies to be sent to citizens without providing personal information (Lönn et al., 2016).…”
Section: Discussion Of Findings Implications and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relatively effortless clarity on roles and responsibilities might rather be because of the central position of these organizations within the public administrations. Public service providers joining the collaboration at a later stage also did not appear to pull into question earlier agreements on the division of roles and responsibilities (in line with Gil-Garcia et al, 2019;Lönn & Uppström, 2016). Coming to a shared goal of the ISD and a clearly specified scope was more difficult than agreeing on the distribution of roles.…”
Section: Engagement Collaboration Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Establishing clear roles and responsibilities can be a strategy intended to reduce resistance among participants in collaborative efforts (Gil-Garcia et al, 2019). Building on the work of Sayogo, Gil-Garcia, and Cronemberger (2016), collaboration strategies to pursue clear roles and responsibilities can consist of frequent interactions; being considerate of the diversity of participants' contexts, objectives and goals; and the use of boundary objects (Lönn & Uppström, 2016), with formal rules and procedures set at the initiation to guide collaboration (Gil-Garcia et al, 2019). As Gil-Garcia et al (2019) note, the downside of more formalized relationships may come at the cost of having adequate flexibility to deal with new issues.…”
Section: Collaboration Strategies For Isdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we have laid out in the preceding section, a careful mix of considerations within the structures, processes and actors' realm both in the design and implementation phases enable the NTF to operate effectively in a fluid and unprecedented context. We have drawn these considerations in a way that suggested their contribution to known ingredients of collaboration success including, gaining public legitimacy (Birner & Wittmer, 2006), achieving broader stakeholder engagement (Onyoin & Bovis, 2021), collaborative capacity (Löfström, 2010;Wilkins et al, 2017), and effective information sharing (Chen, 2010;Cuganesan, Hart, & Steele, 2017;Lönn & Uppström, 2016;Page et al, 2015).…”
Section: Conclusion Lessons and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%