2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2014.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding Fluency and Originality: A latent variable perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
109
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
109
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed high correlations between quantity and originality, this result corresponds to previous studies that indicate relations between originality and fluency (Dumas & Dunbar, 2014;Silvia, 2008). Contrary to Guilford's considerations that point to independence of the factors of creativity, current research indicated relationships between originality and the other components of creativity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…We observed high correlations between quantity and originality, this result corresponds to previous studies that indicate relations between originality and fluency (Dumas & Dunbar, 2014;Silvia, 2008). Contrary to Guilford's considerations that point to independence of the factors of creativity, current research indicated relationships between originality and the other components of creativity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Newer methods for scoring have been developed using semantic distance, which offer an objective alternative for rating originality and flexibility (Dumas & Dunbar, 2014;Forster & Dunbar, 2009;Harbison & Haarmann, 2014;Hass, 2017). For example, a recent study used a novel technique-pointwise mutual information-to measure semantic distance, which correlated strongly with subjective ratings of originality and performed better than participants' own assessments of their creativity (Harbison & Haarmann, 2014).…”
Section: Divergent Thinking Divergent Thinking (Dt) Is a Common Proxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, these characteristics may not have a systematic effect: at a given time, one may be more “inspired” when providing alternative uses for a brick rather than for a cardboard box. This is highlighted by the large proportion of task‐specific variance in creative potential tests scores, as suggested by low to moderate inter‐task correlations (Barbot, Besançon, & Lubart, in press; Dumas & Dunbar, ).…”
Section: Foundations Of Individual Differences In Creativity Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%