Understanding controversies in digital platform innovation processes: The Google Glass case

Abstract

Due to their scaling potential and complexity, digital platforms tend to generate massive controversies and paradoxes. Previous research has generated knowledge about controversies in digital platform innovations. However, it focus mainly on the types of controversy and their effects rather than on the process of controversy emergence. In this article, we analyze how controversies related to digital platform innovation emerge and how they unfold over the innovation process. We analyze the case of the Google Glass failure to establish this ARSG (Augmented Reality Smart Glasses) extension to Google's digital platform. The paper contributes by analyzing the digital platform innovation process as a process of translation, in which there are possible controversy emergence points originated in types of disagreements among the different human actors involved and their interactions with non-human elements.These disagreements are related to specific features of digital platforms: the digital platform generativity, the multisided market arrangements in the platform; the loosely coupled layers of technologies and applications involved, and the opaqueness that results from these arrangements. The framework proposed can support digital platform scholars and practitioners to better understand and deal with controversies.

Digital Transformation and Innovation Management: A Synthesis of Existing Research and an Agenda for Future Studies

“…When it comes to the content of this cluster, we can observe that the concept of digital transformation (Berger et al, 2019; Nambisan et al, 2019; Verhoef et al, 2021) is usually adopted in relationship with a wide range of recently introduced enabling technologies such as AI, industrial internet of things, big data, and smart products (see Blackburn et al, 2017; Chandy et al, 2017; Farrington & Alizadeh, 2017; Fossen & Sorgner, 2019; Iansiti & Lakhani, 2014; Mariani & Fosso Wamba, 2020; Raff et al, 2020; Ransbotham et al, 2016; Sjödin et al, 2020; Verganti et al, 2020). Moreover, the studies included in the cluster offer evidence on service innovation (Sjödin et al, 2020), product‐service systems (Lerch & Gotsch, 2015), organizational practices and routines (Jackson, 2019), change management (Mugge et al, 2020; Solberg et al, 2020), innovation processes (Guenzi & Habel, 2020; Klein et al, 2020), competitive dynamics (Ferreira et al, 2019; Porter & Heppelmann, 2014, 2015), organizational design and structure (Kretschmer & Khashabi, 2020).…”

Innovation Platform: A Study on Donors at Kitabisa.com

“…A Study on Donors at Kitabisa.com enrolment and mobilization [7]. Crowdfunding platform user has five dimensions, namely user motivation, user role, user community, user collaboration and user investment [9].…”

“…The digital platform innovation process consists of problematization, interestment, enrolment and mobilization [7]. Problematization shows that digital innovation proposes a problem and involves the actor in a solution.…”

Experiencing Electric Vehicles: The Car as a Digital Platform

“…Failing in understanding people's expectations and anticipations and controversies with technological innovations that straddle the physical and digital world through digital platforms may cause irreversible damage to the implementation of these technologies. One example is found in Google's investment in Google Glass as an extension of Google's digital platform into a wearable device [7]. Little was known about the serious immediate privacy concerns, the camera in the device made exposed to the people around a Google glass user.…”