2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2012.06.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Underperformance by female CEOs: A more powerful test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Davis and colleages (2010) found that female-led, small-and medium-sized service firms performed better than those led by a male CEO, which was largely due to stronger market orientation of the firms led by a female relative to those led by a male. In contrast, Kolev (2012) found that unconditionally, there was no significant difference in shareholder returns generated by female CEOs and male CEOs; however, controlling for the risk-taking tendency, female CEOs underperformed male CEOs. Based on panel data of S&P 500 firms over a 15-year period, Dezsö and Ross (2012) reported that female representation in top management teams improved firm performance only to the extent that the firm's strategy was focused on innovation.…”
Section: Research Background and Hypothesis Development Gender Differmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Davis and colleages (2010) found that female-led, small-and medium-sized service firms performed better than those led by a male CEO, which was largely due to stronger market orientation of the firms led by a female relative to those led by a male. In contrast, Kolev (2012) found that unconditionally, there was no significant difference in shareholder returns generated by female CEOs and male CEOs; however, controlling for the risk-taking tendency, female CEOs underperformed male CEOs. Based on panel data of S&P 500 firms over a 15-year period, Dezsö and Ross (2012) reported that female representation in top management teams improved firm performance only to the extent that the firm's strategy was focused on innovation.…”
Section: Research Background and Hypothesis Development Gender Differmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Taking into consideration the CAPM model, Kolev (2012) [19] evaluated risks of the firm with female CEO and found that investors perceived women as lower risk takers than men. Based on a survey on the difference between risk appetite among men and women, Croson and Gneezy (2009) discovered that women tended to less prefer risk and competition [7].…”
Section: Women and Their Impact On Risks At The Firmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, whether or not firms led by women underperform is not at all clear. Indeed, research has yielded mixed results for the effect of CEO gender on firm performance (e.g., Davis, Babakus, Englis & Pett, 2010;Hoobler, Masterson, Nkomo & Michel, 2016;Khan & Vieito, 2013;Kolev, 2012;Zhang & Qu, 2016;Jeong & Harrison, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%