2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncovering cortical activations of discourse comprehension and their overlaps with common large-scale neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the stage of study selection, we adopted a relatively strict criterion and excluded the studies using low-level baseline conditions such as fixation presentation. After subtracting adequate baseline conditions, discourse inferences still activated the core brain regions of language processing (i.e., IFG and MTG), which is congruent with a previous meta-analysis based on eight studies (Yang et al, 2019 ). Specifically, the left IFG was well-known as a core region of syntactic and semantic processing such as grammatical categorization (Ni et al, 2000 ), syntax parsing (Friederici and Kotz, 2003 ), semantic information retrieval (Wagner et al, 2001 ), semantic selection (Thompson-Schill et al, 1997 ; Kan and Thompson-Schill, 2004 ), and semantic unification (Hagoort et al, 2004 ; Zhu et al, 2012 ) while the left MTG was found to be associated with semantic processing (Xu et al, 2005 ; Binder et al, 2009 ; Visser and Lambon Ralph, 2011 ), especially a fine semantic activation that supports the processing of semantic integration [see Jung-Beeman ( 2005 ) for a review].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the stage of study selection, we adopted a relatively strict criterion and excluded the studies using low-level baseline conditions such as fixation presentation. After subtracting adequate baseline conditions, discourse inferences still activated the core brain regions of language processing (i.e., IFG and MTG), which is congruent with a previous meta-analysis based on eight studies (Yang et al, 2019 ). Specifically, the left IFG was well-known as a core region of syntactic and semantic processing such as grammatical categorization (Ni et al, 2000 ), syntax parsing (Friederici and Kotz, 2003 ), semantic information retrieval (Wagner et al, 2001 ), semantic selection (Thompson-Schill et al, 1997 ; Kan and Thompson-Schill, 2004 ), and semantic unification (Hagoort et al, 2004 ; Zhu et al, 2012 ) while the left MTG was found to be associated with semantic processing (Xu et al, 2005 ; Binder et al, 2009 ; Visser and Lambon Ralph, 2011 ), especially a fine semantic activation that supports the processing of semantic integration [see Jung-Beeman ( 2005 ) for a review].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This search generated 986 articles in the Web of Science database and 734 articles in the PubMed database. In order to avoid omission, we additionally considered the studies in the relevant meta-analyses (Prado et al, 2011;Yang et al, 2019;Wertheim and Ragni, 2020) and reviews (e.g., Barbey and Patterson, 2011;Virtue and Sundermeier, 2016;Brascamp et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2018), and the studies that cited those meta-analyses and reviews.…”
Section: Elaborative Inferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these areas were seldom reported in previous studies of sentence and discourse comprehension ( Walenski et al. , 2019 ; Yang et al. , 2019 ), a recent study has reported their selective activation in reading vivid passages ( Tamir et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Previous volumetric brain template studies have shown that the anatomical differences between the Chinese and Caucasian volumetric templates are largely located in parts of Wernicke's and Broca's areas. Moreover, Yang et al () found that the default network was central and most pervasively related to discourse comprehension and that the language network overlapped with the default network. Thus, the absolute areal distortion results in the present study, which showed that the greatest differences were in the default network, are somehow matched with those in previous studies and indicated that the Chinese and Caucasian template differences in the language network may also exist in brain cortical surface morphology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%