2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2015.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uncertainty of remotely sensed aboveground biomass over an African tropical forest: Propagating errors from trees to plots to pixels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
94
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
6
94
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Chen et al [46] found that the impact of allometric error contributed about 11% to the total relative prediction error. Mean biomass estimates of the ANR from both ALS and InSAR were lower than the mean estimate from the model with TE (Table 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chen et al [46] found that the impact of allometric error contributed about 11% to the total relative prediction error. Mean biomass estimates of the ANR from both ALS and InSAR were lower than the mean estimate from the model with TE (Table 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Pólya-urn resampling scheme generates a design-consistent posterior predictive distribution of the property in interest, given that the sample is reasonably large and representative of the population ( [43], pp. [44][45][46]. We consider our field sample of u=30 observations as representative of the population, and the Pólya-urn resampling generated posterior predictive distributions of biomass for U = 60, 120, and 180 observations based on the sample.…”
Section: Relative Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this research, each sample plot was first examined to make sure each plot was located within the forest sites and had good representation of the surveyed forest stand. In addition to the plot size and geolocation error, another critical factor is the use of allometric models for AGB calculation for each plot based on field measurement [80]. Improper selection of the allometric models for specific tree species may produce high uncertainty of AGB calculation at the plot level, thus affecting the AGB estimation performance using the remote sensing data.…”
Section: Uncertainties Due To Sample Plotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect is not consistent with the general assumption that individual errors should be compensated for at the plot level. Although the dependence of error propagation on tree size distribution has already been raised (Magnabosco Marra et al, 2015;Mascaro et al, 2011), it is generally omitted from error propagation procedures (e.g., Picard et al, 2014;Moundounga Mavouroulou et al, 2014;Chen et al, 2015). When propagating local bias to 130 1 ha plots in central Africa, the reference pantropical model led to plot-level errors ranging from −15 to +8 %.…”
Section: Model Error Propagation Depends On Targeted Plot Structurementioning
confidence: 99%