2016
DOI: 10.5194/bg-13-1571-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Closing a gap in tropical forest biomass estimation: taking crown mass variation into account in pantropical allometries

Abstract: Abstract. Accurately monitoring tropical forest carbon stocks is a challenge that remains outstanding. Allometric models that consider tree diameter, height and wood density as predictors are currently used in most tropical forest carbon studies. In particular, a pantropical biomass model has been widely used for approximately a decade, and its most recent version will certainly constitute a reference model in the coming years. However, this reference model shows a systematic bias towards the largest trees. Be… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
57
0
9

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(83 reference statements)
7
57
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…; Goodman, Phillips & Baker ; Ploton et al . ) . This study shows that a higher accuracy on biomass estimates might also be achieved by standardizing the diameter to D area130 on the existing biomass allometric equations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…; Goodman, Phillips & Baker ; Ploton et al . ) . This study shows that a higher accuracy on biomass estimates might also be achieved by standardizing the diameter to D area130 on the existing biomass allometric equations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Much work has been devoted to discussing how to adequately estimate individual AGB in trees (Brown, ; Chave et al, ; Feldpausch et al, ; Ketterings et al, ; Ploton et al, ). On the contrary, protocols for shrubs are not well developed (but see Chojnacky & Milton, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results agree with Paul et al () and Jucker et al (), where the inclusion of site‐related factors (stand and climate characteristics) did not markedly improve the predictive ability of the allometric models, but the inclusion of plant architecture‐ or physiognomy‐type did. Varying bioforms or species’ architecture reflect different energy investment strategies likely to result in different crown–mass ratios among woody individuals with similar size (Ploton et al, ). Across our models, the effects of other bioclimatic variables (biome and GAI) significantly improved model fits particularly when height was not included in the model (Models 2 and 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter are calibrated on destructive datasets and combine easily as measurable tree descriptors—typically diameter at breast height (DBH), tree height (H) and wood density (WD)—to derive tree AGB estimate. Calibrating an AGB model requires to account for a number of factors known to affect allometric relationships, such as tree architecture (Goodman, Phillips, & Baker, ; Ploton et al., ), species wood density (e.g. Bastin, Fayolle, et al., ; Chave et al., , ; Zanne et al., ), edaphic and climatic contraints (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%