2014
DOI: 10.4025/dialogos.v18supl.863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uma análise das aproximações e distanciamentos epistemológicos das noções de campo em P. Bourdieu e de arena em E. Ostrom

Abstract: Uma análise das aproximações e distanciamentos epistemológicos das noções de campo em P.Bourdieu e de arena em E. Ostrom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, arena constitutes a field where incumbents and challengers recognize each other positions and stir their dispute. Bacchiegga and Da Costa Ferreira (2014) stress the difference between the concept of field introduced by Bourdieu (1980) and the concept of arena proposed by Ostrom (2008), by indicating that in the field, differently from the arena, agents may not always be aware of the existence of any symbolic struggle. The present work understands arena as a status of the field where agents recognize and stir their different and frequently confronting positions.…”
Section: Baseline Concepts: Field Agents and Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Therefore, arena constitutes a field where incumbents and challengers recognize each other positions and stir their dispute. Bacchiegga and Da Costa Ferreira (2014) stress the difference between the concept of field introduced by Bourdieu (1980) and the concept of arena proposed by Ostrom (2008), by indicating that in the field, differently from the arena, agents may not always be aware of the existence of any symbolic struggle. The present work understands arena as a status of the field where agents recognize and stir their different and frequently confronting positions.…”
Section: Baseline Concepts: Field Agents and Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 86%