1989
DOI: 10.1016/s0190-9622(89)80048-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultraviolet light—induced confluent and reticulated papillomatosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Vassileva et al26 reported a case of a young female who developed histologically confirmed CRP over tanned areas of sun exposure. They proposed that UV-light-induced melanogenesis and transient epidermal hyperplasia resulted in the cutaneous eruption.…”
Section: Etiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vassileva et al26 reported a case of a young female who developed histologically confirmed CRP over tanned areas of sun exposure. They proposed that UV-light-induced melanogenesis and transient epidermal hyperplasia resulted in the cutaneous eruption.…”
Section: Etiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two prominent theories are an abnormal host response to fungi 3 and a keratinization defect. 4,5 Other hypothesis include photosensitivity, 6 genetic factor, 7 amylodosis cutis 8 and endocrinopathy. 9…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Although several theories have been proposed as causal factors in CRP, the two most widely accepted ones are that CRP is an abnormal host reaction to M. furfur 13 or a keratinization defect. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8]14 Both theories are not incompatible, since CRP could be an abnormal keratinization disorder determined (or at least triggered) by an anomalous host response to M. furfur. 15 The 'fungal' theory was supported by the detection of M. furfur in cutaneous lesions and the favourable response to antifungal treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%