Background Pemphigus encompasses a group of life‐threatening autoimmune bullous diseases characterized by blisters and erosions of the mucous membranes and skin. Before the era of immunosuppressive treatment, pemphigus was almost always fatal. Due to its rarity, only few randomized controlled therapeutic trials are available. Recently, rituximab has been approved as first‐line treatment for moderate and severe pemphigus vulgaris in Europe and the United States. Objectives The Autoimmune blistering diseases Task Force of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) has initiated a throughout update of the guideline for the management of patients with pemphigus. Results The guidelines for the management of pemphigus were updated, and the degree of consent among all task force members was included. The final version of the guideline was consented by the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) and several patient organizations.

We present here the recommendations resulting from this Delphi process. This international consensus includes intravenous CD20 inhibitors as a first line therapy option for moderate to severe pemphigus.

Background Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common autoimmune subepidermal blistering disease of the skin and mucous membranes. This disease typically affects the elderly and presents with itch and localized or, most frequently, generalized bullous lesions. A subset of patients only develops excoriations, prurigo-like lesions, and eczematous and/or urticarial erythematous lesions. The disease, which is significantly associated with neurological disorders, has high morbidity and severely impacts the quality of life. Objectives and methodologyThe Autoimmune blistering diseases Task Force of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology sought to update the guidelines for the management of BP based on new clinical information, and new evidence on diagnostic tools and interventions. The recommendations are either evidence-based or rely on expert opinion. The degree of consent among all task force members was included.Results Treatment depends on the severity of BP and patients' comorbidities. High-potency topical corticosteroids are recommended as the mainstay of treatment whenever possible. Oral prednisone at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg/day is a recommended alternative. In case of contraindications or resistance to corticosteroids, immunosuppressive therapies, such as methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil or mycophenolate acid, may be recommended. The use of doxycycline and dapsone is controversial. They may be recommended, in particular, in patients with contraindications to oral corticosteroids. B-cell-depleting therapy and intravenous immunoglobulins may be considered in treatment-resistant cases. Omalizumab and dupilumab have recently shown promising results. The final version of the guideline was consented to by several patient organizations. ConclusionsThe guidelines for the management of BP were updated. They summarize evidence-and expert-based recommendations useful in clinical practice.

This first international consensus conference established generally agreed-upon clinical and laboratory criteria defining the clinical classification of and diagnostic testing for EBA. Holding these voting exercises in person with the possibility of discussion prior to voting has advantages in reaching consensus over Delphi exercises with remote voting.

Summary Background The Bullous Pemphigoid Disease Area Index (BPDAI) score has been proposed to provide an objective measure of bullous pemphigoid (BP) activity. Objectives The objective of this study was to calculate BPDAI cut‐off values defining mild, moderate and severe BP. We also aimed to assess the interrater reliability and correlation with the number of daily new blisters, and anti‐BP180 and anti‐BP230 antibodies. Methods Severity scores were recorded by two blinded investigators. Anti‐BP180 and anti‐BP230 antibodies were measured using an enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Cut‐off values defining mild, moderate and severe subgroups were calculated based on the 25th and 75th percentiles of the BPDAI score. Results In total, 285 patients with BP were enrolled from 50 dermatology departments in Europe. Median BPDAI activity was 37·5 points (range 0–164). Cut‐off values corresponding to the first and third quartiles of the BPDAI score were 20 and 57, respectively; thus, these values were used to define mild (≤ 19), moderate (≥ 20 and ≤ 56) and severe (≥ 57) BP. The median BPDAI score for patients with ≤ 10 daily new blisters was 26 [interquartile range (IQR) 17–45], and for patients with > 10 daily new blisters the median score was 55 (IQR 39–82). The BPDAI intraclass correlation coefficient measured at baseline was 0·97 and remained higher than 0·90 up to month 6. The improvement in the BPDAI score was correlated with the absolute decrease in anti‐BP180 ELISA value (Spearman’s rank r = 0·34, P < 0·004), but not with anti‐BP230 antibodies (r = 0·17, P = 0·15). Conclusions This study suggests cut‐off values of 20–57 for BPDAI to distinguish mild, moderate and severe BP, and confirms that it is a robust tool to assess BP severity precisely.