2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2015.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultrasound Use for Body Composition and Carcass Quality Assessment in Cattle and Lambs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result of the study is in agreement to Peña et al (2014) that correlation between ultrasound and carcass longissimus muscle measurement (rib eye area, fat thickness and intramuscular fat content/marbling) of Charolais, Limaosin and Retinta cattle apporoximately about 0.251 to 0.625. Applying ultrasound measurement of carcass quality closer to slaughter resulting correlation coefficient between ultrasound and carcass quality increased to higher value and gave impact on accuracy determination especially for lean cattle (Tait, 2016). Moreover, Tait (2016) reported that there was high genetic correlations (≥0.5) between ultrasound-measured body compotiotion with carcass attributes in harvested cattle and lambs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result of the study is in agreement to Peña et al (2014) that correlation between ultrasound and carcass longissimus muscle measurement (rib eye area, fat thickness and intramuscular fat content/marbling) of Charolais, Limaosin and Retinta cattle apporoximately about 0.251 to 0.625. Applying ultrasound measurement of carcass quality closer to slaughter resulting correlation coefficient between ultrasound and carcass quality increased to higher value and gave impact on accuracy determination especially for lean cattle (Tait, 2016). Moreover, Tait (2016) reported that there was high genetic correlations (≥0.5) between ultrasound-measured body compotiotion with carcass attributes in harvested cattle and lambs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying ultrasound measurement of carcass quality closer to slaughter resulting correlation coefficient between ultrasound and carcass quality increased to higher value and gave impact on accuracy determination especially for lean cattle (Tait, 2016). Moreover, Tait (2016) reported that there was high genetic correlations (≥0.5) between ultrasound-measured body compotiotion with carcass attributes in harvested cattle and lambs. The heritability of ultrasound backfat thickness and marbling score are high, both of them have heritability value about 0.31±0.11 and 0.37±0.11, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consumer requirements for beef have increasingly shifted towards safety, high quality, nutritive value, and products from sustainable farming practices (Hocquette et al 2014). Improved consumer trust, economic benefits and predictive relation to carcass yield/dressing percentage are the main reasons for developing quality evaluation systems for live animals (Tait 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrasound is performed to scan LP, m. LD, m. PM on the chest following the method of Jakaria et al (2017) on 12 th -13 th ribs, and the lumbar part above the flank at 4 th -5 th lumbar bone, which is more backward than Tait (2016) has done. Thickness measurement m. BF, m. GM, m. LD, and m. PM in the gluteus follows the method used by Silva et al (2012) between the ischium and ilium bones (Figure 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%