The European Mayor
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-531-90005-6_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Typologies of Local Government Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
6

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
38
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This view of the role of institutions has favored studies that try to identify instances of different "adjustments" of notions of democracy to various institutional frameworks. For instance, Haus and Sweeting (2006a, b) used the rich existing theoretical framework on typologies of local government (Borraz and John, 2004;Genieys et al, 2004;Goldsmith and Larsen, 2004;Leach and Wilson, 2004;Wollmann, 2004;Heinelt and Hlepas, 2006) to model different types of local democracy -such as "local representative" northern European local democracy and "strong mayor" models in southern Europe-to predict distinct types of local leadership. On the other hand, Denters and Klok (2013) explored whether local institutions that promote citizen participation are related to more responsive attitudes among local leaders.…”
Section: Mayors' Notions Of Democracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This view of the role of institutions has favored studies that try to identify instances of different "adjustments" of notions of democracy to various institutional frameworks. For instance, Haus and Sweeting (2006a, b) used the rich existing theoretical framework on typologies of local government (Borraz and John, 2004;Genieys et al, 2004;Goldsmith and Larsen, 2004;Leach and Wilson, 2004;Wollmann, 2004;Heinelt and Hlepas, 2006) to model different types of local democracy -such as "local representative" northern European local democracy and "strong mayor" models in southern Europe-to predict distinct types of local leadership. On the other hand, Denters and Klok (2013) explored whether local institutions that promote citizen participation are related to more responsive attitudes among local leaders.…”
Section: Mayors' Notions Of Democracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to most classifications of local government systems, both Sweden and Norway belong to the Northern European group (Heinelt & Hlepas ; Hesse & Sharpe ; Lidström ). Both are unitary states, but with far‐reaching responsibilities delegated to the local level.…”
Section: Local Government Systems In Sweden and Norwaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Councils choosing the mayoral route (subject to prior approval in a local referendum) were initially allowed to choose between a cabinet and an alternative model under which mayors would take day-to-day policy decisions on the advice of a council manager -a senior civil servant likely to be the authority"s incumbent chief executive. This course proved immediately politically sensitive, given that it would reduce elected councillors to a second-tier role under a "presidential" mayor and his/her unelected aide (Heinelt, H. and Hlepas, N-K, 2006). Only one council, Stoke-onTrent, ever adopted it, and when it subsequently abandoned this in favour of the leader and cabinet model the Government amended the provisions in the Local Government Act 2000 to remove the option altogether (HM Stationery Office, 2007).…”
Section: Cabinet Government Secrecy and The Demise Of Open Debatementioning
confidence: 99%