2022
DOI: 10.15544/mts.2022.20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Typological Model of Emotional Inclusion in Employees’ Engagement

Abstract: The study of the emotional inclusion of employees' engagement becomes increasingly important in modern organizations that operate under conditions of globalization, growing competition, and in tight competition for specialists. The research associated to this phenomenon and behaviour of engaged employees is becoming more relevant, and it increases the need to deeper the knowledge about it and to classify this phenomenon according to its typological features. The results of previous studies have revealed the ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whilst there have been some related typologies previously developed such as the classification of engagement types (Shuck et al, 2017), antecedents to employee engagement such as the leadership typology (Juchnowicz and Kinowska, 2018), antecedents to work disengagement (Afrahi et al, 2022), resources for employee engagement (here, the authors differentiate resources from antecedents, considering that resources do not have directionality or temporal limitations so they can be both an antecedent or an outcome. That said, this research appears to focus on the influence of the categorised resources on employee engagement) (Lee et al, 2020) and Evaluating employee engagement emotional inclusion in employees' engagement (Vaitkevi cius and Vidrevi cien_ e, 2022), to the best of our knowledge this is the first typology of engaged and disengaged behaviours within the workplace classified into their constructive and destructive effects. Moreover, the typology demonstrates that rather than distinguishing between engagement, no engagement and disengagement (Afrahi et al, 2022), it is more accurate to recognise that both employee engagement and disengagement have the capacity to be constructive or destructive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whilst there have been some related typologies previously developed such as the classification of engagement types (Shuck et al, 2017), antecedents to employee engagement such as the leadership typology (Juchnowicz and Kinowska, 2018), antecedents to work disengagement (Afrahi et al, 2022), resources for employee engagement (here, the authors differentiate resources from antecedents, considering that resources do not have directionality or temporal limitations so they can be both an antecedent or an outcome. That said, this research appears to focus on the influence of the categorised resources on employee engagement) (Lee et al, 2020) and Evaluating employee engagement emotional inclusion in employees' engagement (Vaitkevi cius and Vidrevi cien_ e, 2022), to the best of our knowledge this is the first typology of engaged and disengaged behaviours within the workplace classified into their constructive and destructive effects. Moreover, the typology demonstrates that rather than distinguishing between engagement, no engagement and disengagement (Afrahi et al, 2022), it is more accurate to recognise that both employee engagement and disengagement have the capacity to be constructive or destructive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That said, this research appears to focus on the influence of the categorised resources on employee engagement) (Lee et al. , 2020) and emotional inclusion in employees’ engagement (Vaitkevičius and Vidrevičienė, 2022), to the best of our knowledge this is the first typology of engaged and disengaged behaviours within the workplace classified into their constructive and destructive effects. Moreover, the typology demonstrates that rather than distinguishing between engagement, no engagement and disengagement (Afrahi et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%