2017
DOI: 10.1257/aer.p20171058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tying the Double-Knot: The Role of Assets in Marriage Commitment

Abstract: What explains the growing gap in marriage rates between socioeconomic groups? We present a robust stylized fact not previously documented: marriage rates are higher for individuals with more assets. We argue this may be driven by marriage and cohabitation becoming increasingly similar in a number of ways except for the way assets become marital property to be divided upon divorce in marriage while they remain individual property in the case of cohabitation. We propose that ownership of assets may provide “insu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Divorce laws affect household behavior both within and outside marriage. 1 The legal regime governing the division of property after divorce affects bargaining power (Chiappori, Fortin, and Lacroix, 2002) and incentives to make marriage-specific investments (Stevenson, 2007;Fisher, 2012;Lundberg and Pollak, 2015;Lafortune and Low, 2017). Evidence of these effects has improved our understanding of intrahousehold behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Divorce laws affect household behavior both within and outside marriage. 1 The legal regime governing the division of property after divorce affects bargaining power (Chiappori, Fortin, and Lacroix, 2002) and incentives to make marriage-specific investments (Stevenson, 2007;Fisher, 2012;Lundberg and Pollak, 2015;Lafortune and Low, 2017). Evidence of these effects has improved our understanding of intrahousehold behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are more likely to accumulate assets during the relationship and may be more responsive than low-earning couples to regulation changing property rights at separation. Lafortune and Low (2017) argue that having assets increases the value of marriage in a world where marriage and cohabitation have become relatively similar except for the way assets are split at separation. Chiappori, Iyigun, Lafortune, and Weiss (2016) find that the effect of changes in cohabitation are actually higher among college educated individuals than among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Miller and Schofield (2008, pp. 433–450) report: “Republicans could (and did) form a marriage of convenience between populists and economic conservatives, in opposition to the federal government as sponsor of the social change catalyzed by the movements for civil rights, women's rights, consumer rights, and the environment.” See also: Bitler et al (2004), Thomas (2001) and Lafortune & Low (2017). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%