2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11255-014-0835-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-suture single-armed longitudinal intussusception vasoepididymostomy for obstructive azoospermia: report of patients characteristics and outcome

Abstract: Two-suture single-armed longitudinal intussusception microsurgical vasoepididymostomy is a feasible option for couples with male factor infertility due to epididymal OA. Reasonable patency outcomes were achieved in the present series of cases. Individualized counseling, with expectations based on obstructive etiology and anticipated surgical outcomes, should be offered to couples before resorting to assisted reproduction. Longer follow-up is required to ascertain long-term patency, pregnancy outcomes, and late… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in 2013 5 and he obtained good outcomes with a 58.8% patency rate. Binsaleh 6 reported similar results, showing a 59% patency rate and 36% pregnancy rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…in 2013 5 and he obtained good outcomes with a 58.8% patency rate. Binsaleh 6 reported similar results, showing a 59% patency rate and 36% pregnancy rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…It seems that the patency rates with the single-armed suture technique for VEs in both reports 5 6 were unexpectedly lower than the double-armed technique. This could be associated with multiple factors such as number of cases, different etiological causes of epididymal obstruction, and different microsurgical modifications or microsurgical materials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Microsurgical vasoepididymostomy (MVE) has been demonstrated to be a cost‐effective treatment for men with epididymal obstructive azoospermia (EOA) (Berardinucci et al ., ; Chan et al ., ; Kumar et al ., ). Compared with assisted reproductive technology, microsurgical procedure can avoid female ovarian stimulation, allow for the natural selection of the best spermatozoa and achieve a pregnancy rate of 32% to 40% (Kumar et al ., ; Ho et al ., ; Peng et al ., ; Binsaleh, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Azoospermia, an essential factor for male infertility, is categorised into obstructive and nonobstructive azoospermia (Chen et al ., ; Qin et al ., ). Obstructive azoospermia is mainly caused by bilateral occlusion at genital tract or ejaculatory dysfunction, and presents normal spermatogenesis, but nonobstructive azoospermia exhibits abnormal histopathology (Binsaleh, ; Esteves et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%