Among the II-VI semiconductors, zinc oxide (ZnO) has attracted considerable interest on account of its wide band gap (3.37 eV) and large exciton binding energy (60 meV).1-3 The nonlinear optical responses of ZnO were investigated to better understand the nonlinear optical properties, such as secondharmonic generation (SHG) and third-harmonic generation (THG). [4][5][6][7][8][9] The non-resonant two-photon absorption (2PA) and three-photon absorption (3PA) processes were also examined by monitoring the multiphoton-induced photoluminescence. 4,10 However, there are few reports on the simultaneous measurements of harmonic generation (SHG and THG) and multiphoton absorption (2PA and 3PA), 4,11 although the competition between them is important for potential applications. In this Communication, we present the nonlinear optical properties of ZnO, which were examined by the nonresonant optical excitation of femtosecond laser pulses at a wavelength of 800 nm.ZnO bulk powders ( Fig. 1(a)) were purchased from Aldrich (#205532) and employed for measurements without further purification and annealing. The ZnO powders were drop-coated on glass substrates and excited with a He-Cd laser (325 nm, Kimmon) to obtain the photoluminescence spectrum ( Fig. 1(b)). The emission peak in the UV region, which is attributed to exciton recombination, 1-3 is observed at 382 nm, while there is virtually no visible emission. Because the visible emission of ZnO is related to various defects, 1-3 the absence of visible emission suggests that this sample is suitable for a study of the nonlinear optical properties of ZnO without the perturbation of defects.For measurements of the nonlinear optical response, ZnO was excited by the fundamental of a cavity-dumped oscillator (Mira/PulseSwitch, Coherent, 1 MHz, 800 nm, 150 fs) using a UV microscope objective (LUCPLFLN40X, Olympus, NA 0.6). The emission and SHG were collected by the same objective, resolved spectrally using a monochromator (SP-2150i, Acton Research Corp.), and detected by a photomultiplier (P2/PD-471, Acton Research Corp.). Figure 1(c) clearly shows the SHG at 400 nm (twice the photon energy of 800 nm), while the THG near 267 nm is barely observable (inset of Fig. 1(c)). The other peak at 382 nm, in the blue side of the SHG, appears to be from another nonlinear optical response, because the photon energy of 382 nm is significantly different from that of 800 nm and its multiple. In order to understand the mechanism for UV emission, the emission spectra were obtained as a function of the excitation intensity of 800 nm ( Fig. 2(a)). UV emission and SHG increase nonlinearly with increasing excitation intensity, suggesting nonlinear optical responses. On the other hand, a closer examination reveals that the nonlinearity of UV emission is not identical to that of the SHG, which is observed more clearly in the normalized spectra ( Fig. 2(b)). The ratio of the UV to SHG emission increases with increasing excitation intensity. In other words, the intensity of UV emission increases fast compare...