SAE Technical Paper Series 2006
DOI: 10.4271/2006-01-1201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-Photon Laser-Induced Fluorescence of Nitric Oxide in a Diesel Engine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ideally, it would be possible to quantitatively and non-intrusively measure the incylinder NO x -production rate and NO x distribution with a high degree of spatial and temporal resolution. Unfortunately, such measurements of NO x -relevant species (e.g., NO, NO 2 , N 2 , N, O 2 , O, OH, and H) and charge-gas temperature at typical diesel-engine conditions are not currently possible, and it is not clear when they will be (see e.g., [33,52,53]). In the mean time, it seems justifiable to use existing knowledge combined with thought experiments to help elucidate a "big picture" view of the mechanisms that determine fuel effects on NO x emissions, even though the thought experiments must necessarily contain some unproven assumptions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, it would be possible to quantitatively and non-intrusively measure the incylinder NO x -production rate and NO x distribution with a high degree of spatial and temporal resolution. Unfortunately, such measurements of NO x -relevant species (e.g., NO, NO 2 , N 2 , N, O 2 , O, OH, and H) and charge-gas temperature at typical diesel-engine conditions are not currently possible, and it is not clear when they will be (see e.g., [33,52,53]). In the mean time, it seems justifiable to use existing knowledge combined with thought experiments to help elucidate a "big picture" view of the mechanisms that determine fuel effects on NO x emissions, even though the thought experiments must necessarily contain some unproven assumptions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%