“…The authors did not challenge the monophyly of Rhamphophryne, which is supported by limited morphology (see Frost et al, 2006:217) and has been upheld in phylogenetic analyses of DNA sequences (Van Bocxlaer et al, 2010;Pyron and Wiens, 2011;see ''Phylogenetic relationships,'' below). Consequently, we follow Chaparro et al (2007) in describing this toad as a new species of Rhinella and, to facilitate comparisons, refer to the species of the former Rhamphophryne-including R. acrolopha (Trueb, 1971), R. festae (Peracca, 1904), R. lindae (Rivero and Castaño, 1990), R. macrorhina (Trueb, 1971), R. nicefori (Cochran and Goin, 1970), R. rostrata (Noble, 1920), R. ruizi (Grant, 2000(Grant, ''1999, R. tenrec (Lynch and Renjifo, 1990), and R. truebae (Lynch and Renjifo, 1990)-as the Rhinella acrolopha group.…”