2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2005.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-dimensional SPH simulations of wedge water entries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
134
2
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 328 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
134
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…However, most SPH applications have been documented in the coastal hydrodynamics, such as wave breaking (Monaghan and Kos, 1999;Dalrymple and Rogers, 2006), wave overtopping (Gomez-Gesteira et al, 2005) and wave interaction with breakwater (Rogers et al, 2010). Other areas of common SPH application are related to some rapid unsteady flows, such as dam break (Afshar and Shobeyri, 2010), water entry of an object (Oger et al, 2006) and landslide-induced wave (Ataie-Ashtiani and Shobeyri, 2008). It has been noted that very few SPH works are reported in the open channel flows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most SPH applications have been documented in the coastal hydrodynamics, such as wave breaking (Monaghan and Kos, 1999;Dalrymple and Rogers, 2006), wave overtopping (Gomez-Gesteira et al, 2005) and wave interaction with breakwater (Rogers et al, 2010). Other areas of common SPH application are related to some rapid unsteady flows, such as dam break (Afshar and Shobeyri, 2010), water entry of an object (Oger et al, 2006) and landslide-induced wave (Ataie-Ashtiani and Shobeyri, 2008). It has been noted that very few SPH works are reported in the open channel flows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, in order to evaluate pressure an approach similar to the one presented by Oger et al (2006) was adopted, albeit simplified since pressure is evaluated as a mean of values computed for real particles in proximity of the boundary particle, i.e. in a rectangular region with width parallel to boundary surface and height perpendicular to boundary surface which are multiples of the smoothing length (in particular, a 4 × 10 region was considered).…”
Section: Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Method Adopted By Dinavmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the direct factor of aforementioned load overestimation. Accelerations in 2-DoF asymmetric slamming are compared with experimental data [26] and another numerical simulation using SPH method [27] in Fig. 8 The error is greater in the case of angular acceleration calculation …”
Section: Symmetric and Asymmetric Wedge Water-entrymentioning
confidence: 99%