2000
DOI: 10.1002/1522-2683(20000701)21:13<2670::aid-elps2670>3.3.co;2-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-dimensional electrophoretic and immunoblot analysis of cell surface proteins of spiral-shaped and coccoid forms of Helicobacter pylori

Abstract: Cell surface proteins of the human gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori extracted during different in vitro growth phases were analyzed by one- and two-dimensional gelelectrophoresis (1-DE and 2-DE) and by 2-DE immunoblot. Broth-cultured H. pylori cells were stained with an acridine-orange dye to monitor the morphological status of the organism. In 2-day-cultures, 96% of the bacterial cells were spiral-shaped and four days later a morphological switch to coccoid forms occurred. In 10-day cultures spiral-shaped… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The publication of the genomic sequence of three H. pylori strains has assisted in the proteomic analysis and subsequent identification of antigens: strain 26695, isolated from a patient with superficial gastritis [36], strain J99, obtained from a patient with duodenal ulcer (DU) disease [37] and strain HPAG1, isolated from a patient with chronic atrophic gastritis [38]. Several groups have used this approach to detect candidate antigens of H. pylori for diagnosis, therapy and vaccine development, as well as to investigate potential associations between specific immune responses and manifestations of disease, revealing a high variability of humoral recognition pattern among different patients and H. pylori isolates [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. In each study, there was considerable inter-individual variation that may be partially related to specific antigen patterns of the various H. pylori strains that infected the different patients [48].…”
Section: H Pylori Immunoproteomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The publication of the genomic sequence of three H. pylori strains has assisted in the proteomic analysis and subsequent identification of antigens: strain 26695, isolated from a patient with superficial gastritis [36], strain J99, obtained from a patient with duodenal ulcer (DU) disease [37] and strain HPAG1, isolated from a patient with chronic atrophic gastritis [38]. Several groups have used this approach to detect candidate antigens of H. pylori for diagnosis, therapy and vaccine development, as well as to investigate potential associations between specific immune responses and manifestations of disease, revealing a high variability of humoral recognition pattern among different patients and H. pylori isolates [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. In each study, there was considerable inter-individual variation that may be partially related to specific antigen patterns of the various H. pylori strains that infected the different patients [48].…”
Section: H Pylori Immunoproteomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, two novel protective antigens that fulfill all criteria were identified using this process (HP0410 and HP0231). The ever-increasing information on microbial genomes and a comprehensive list of more than 600 immunoreactive antigens described through proteomic approaches (Kimmel et al, 2000;Krah et al, 2004;Nilsson et al, 2000) now allow us to up-date and refine these criteria. At least three antigens, NapA, HP0410 (putative neuraminyl lactose-binding hemagglutinin homologue) and HP0231 (homologue of DsbA and DsbC, which have been described to oxidize protein thiols and have a potential role in the periplasmic folding of proteins in E. coli, (Bessette et al, 2001)) fulfill all criteria.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been used for the identification of antigenic proteins such as those of Helicobacter pylori [14,15], Chlamydia trachomatis [16], Edwardsiella tarda [17,18], Edwardsiella ictaluri [19], Shigella flexneri [20], Borrelia garinii [21], and Nisseria meningitides [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%