Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
International Electron Devices Meeting 1999. Technical Digest (Cat. No.99CH36318)
DOI: 10.1109/iedm.1999.824167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-dimensional dopant characterization using SIMS, SCS and TSUPREM4

Abstract: Quantitative two-dimensional (2D) dopant profiling for 0.25 micron CMOS technology was demonstrated using secondary ion mass-spectrometry (SIMS) and scanning capacitance spectroscopy (SCS). P-well and N-well dopant profiles measured by 2D SIMS are in agreement with TSUPREM4 (TS4) simulations. TS4 was pre-calibrated to the specific technology using 1D SIMS and electrical data. 2D SIMS, TS4 and SCS show agreement on the well boundary location. SCS is an advanced form of scanning capacitance microscopy (SCM) devi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All major assumptions of the methods have to be examined for their impact, and relaxed if necessary. 16 Alternatively, one can treat the extraction method as the definition of electrical quantities, to be used only in a context that is consistent with the extraction method [14], and rely instead on physical techniques such as those described in [15]- [17] for obtaining physical quantities.…”
Section: E Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All major assumptions of the methods have to be examined for their impact, and relaxed if necessary. 16 Alternatively, one can treat the extraction method as the definition of electrical quantities, to be used only in a context that is consistent with the extraction method [14], and rely instead on physical techniques such as those described in [15]- [17] for obtaining physical quantities.…”
Section: E Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key to note is that the difference between the two terms in (12) lies in the fact that the latter is proportional to . Due to counter-doping and short channel effects, 15 the edge of the channel behaves differently from the center, and is not scaled with channel length. The extraction routine cannot distinguish between this and the source/drain resistance, thus it lumps the former with the latter.…”
Section: Limits Of the Shift-and-ratio Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, metrology for 2-D profile characterization is an open issue with no definitive solution. Progress in both the modeling and measurements of shallow junctions, while encouraging [10]- [12], is still far from routine or sufficient to fully support the ongoing experimental challenges of scaling. During the late 1990s, the importance of electrical effects other than those of the intrinsic devices and gate delays, especially the role of interconnect and substrate parasitics, became a major concern.…”
Section: Technology Scaling and Evolution Of Tcadmentioning
confidence: 99%