2017
DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2017.119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tunable room-temperature single-photon emission at telecom wavelengths from sp3 defects in carbon nanotubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
414
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 250 publications
(429 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
13
414
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[32] In contrast, the other 20 trajectories only show deviations in the emission energies around the equilibrium (~2.3 eV) until the end of the simulation (at the final step of these 20 trajectories, the oscillator strengths of the S 1 -S 0 transitions are predicted to vary from 0.0772 to 0.1604, proving the optically allowed nature of the transitions; see Table S3 for details). [38,39] Figure 3 shows the results of a representative trajectory, which takes 188.5 fs to reach the CI point, at which the potential energy surfaces of S 1 and S 0 state almost cross and the S 1 -S 0 state energy difference is merely 0.14 eV (The structural evolution during the simulation of this trajectory can be found in Movie S1.). [37] It is predictable that such fast nonradiative decays can be a nonnegligible competitor to the radiative decay channels and thus affect the luminescent efficiencies of the materials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32] In contrast, the other 20 trajectories only show deviations in the emission energies around the equilibrium (~2.3 eV) until the end of the simulation (at the final step of these 20 trajectories, the oscillator strengths of the S 1 -S 0 transitions are predicted to vary from 0.0772 to 0.1604, proving the optically allowed nature of the transitions; see Table S3 for details). [38,39] Figure 3 shows the results of a representative trajectory, which takes 188.5 fs to reach the CI point, at which the potential energy surfaces of S 1 and S 0 state almost cross and the S 1 -S 0 state energy difference is merely 0.14 eV (The structural evolution during the simulation of this trajectory can be found in Movie S1.). [37] It is predictable that such fast nonradiative decays can be a nonnegligible competitor to the radiative decay channels and thus affect the luminescent efficiencies of the materials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For inter‐metropolitan fiber‐based quantum networks, telecom or near‐telecom wavelength emission is needed so as to take advantage of low‐loss transmission window granted by the silica optical fiber, which is probably the only financially affordable option for large‐scale deployment of long‐distance communication. The wavelength compatibility has been realized on multiple systems including emergent emitters in GaN, defects in SiC, doping of carbon nanotubes, and rare‐earth Er 3+ ions in solids, but not yet on split‐vacancy color centers, which require different techniques of frequency downconversion similar to those applied to semiconductor quantum dots . Secondly, mK cryogenic temperature operation on SiV − center is too costly and cumbersome for any practical usage of the long memory lifetime.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison, we also simulate the properties of the SPP waveguide modes when the silver nanowire is placed on a glass substrate (refractive index n glass = 1.5), and the simulation results are displayed in Figure b. Herein, the wavelength is set to be λ = 1310 nm . It should be stressed that the choice of this particular wavelength is arbitrary, and that the structural geometry can always be tuned to match the desired resonant wavelength in the nanoslit.…”
Section: Spp Waveguide Mode With Long Propagation Length and Without mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thickness of the silver and air in the simulation model are 300 and 2700 nm, respectively. The emission wavelength of the quantum emitter is set to be λ = 1310 nm . The quantum emitter oriented along the z ‐axis is chosen because its total emission rate is several dozen times that of the quantum emitters oriented along the x ‐ or y ‐axis .…”
Section: Brightening the Single‐photon Emission In The Waveguide–slitmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation