Tumorsize dependent detection rate of endorectal MRI of prostate cancer—A histopathologic correlation with whole-mount sections in 70 patients with prostate cancer

Roethke, Matthias; Lichy, Matthias P.; Jurgschat, Leo; Hennenlotter, Jörg; Vogel, U.; Schilling, David; Stenzl, Arnulf; Claussen, Claus D.; Schlemmer, Heinz Peter

doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.01.014

Cited by 42 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…4). In accordance with the studies by Sumura et al [14] and Roethke et al [18] dealing with detection rates in relation to tumor volume, in our study both modalities had increasing accuracy for prostate cancer detection with increasing tumor volume. Sumura et al, to our knowledge the first study group to evaluate RTE and MRI in the same patient population, found superiority for RTE in the detection of small cancer lesions compared with T2-weighted MRI and CE-MRI separately.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 79%

“…In general, imaging of prostate cancer is limited by tumor volume (size) and grade, because cancers with a predominant Gleason pattern of 3 (i.e., Gleason score of 6 with 3 + 3 or of 7 with 3 + 4) are intermixed with normal glands and glands with dilated lumina (sparse tumors) [7,17,18]. Delongchamps et al [16] used a similar multiparametric MRI setting with an endorectal coil at 1.5 T and for prostate cancers with volumes greater than 0.2 cm 3 reported a sensitivity of 80% for the peripheral zone and 53% for the transitional zone, which are in concordance with our results.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparison of Real-Time Elastography and Multiparametric MRI for Prostate Cancer Detection: A Whole-Mount Step-Section Analysis

Junker

Schäfer

Kobel

et al. 2014

American Journal of Roentgenology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 79%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Real-Time Elastography and Multiparametric MRI for Prostate Cancer Detection: A Whole-Mount Step-Section Analysis

Junker

Schäfer

Kobel

et al. 2014

American Journal of Roentgenology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Many studies analyzing the morphology and visualization of the tumour noted that the probability of detection decreases with the decreasing size of the lesions (11).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The role of different PI-RADS versions in prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance tomography assessment

Aliukonis

Letauta

Briedienė

et al. 2017

AML

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. Standardised Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) guidelines for the assessment of prostate alterations were designed for the assessment of prostate pathology. Published by the ESUR in 2012, PI-RADS v1 was based on the total score of different MRI sequences with subsequent calculation. PI-RADS v2 was published by the American College of Radiology in 2015 and featured different assessment criteria for prostate peripheral and transitory zones.Aim. To assess the correlations of PI-RADS v1 and PI-RADS v2 with Gleason score values and to define their predictive values of the diagnosis of prostate cancer.Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis of 66 patients. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) value and the Gleason score (GS) were assessed. One the most malignant focal lesion was selected in the peripheral zone of each lobe of the prostate (91 in total). Statistical analysis was carried out applying SPSS software, v.23, p < 0.05.Results. Focal lesions assessed by PI-RADS v1 score: 10% -1, 12% -2, 41% -3, 23% -4, 14% -5. Assessment applying PI-RADS v.2: 20% -1, 7.5% -2, 26%, 29.5%, and 17% were assessed by 3, 4, and 5 scores. Statistically relevant correlation was found only between GS and PI-RADS (p = 0.033).The positive predictive value of both versions of PI-RADS -75%, negative predictive value of PI-RADS v1 -46%, PI-RADS v2 -43%.Conclusions. PI-RADS v1 was more statistically relevant in assessing the grade of tumour. Prediction values were similar in both versions.

show abstract

“…The sensitivity regarding prostate cancer detection varies in the literature between 36 % and 95 % which primarily depends on the cohort that was examined. To evaluate the diagnostic quality of T2w imaging as a function of tumor size, it was shown in a study with histological large-area sections that morphological T2w imaging alone is not able to reliably rule out carcinoma foci smaller than 10 mm [20]. Therefore, morphological MRI must be supplemented by functional techniques.…”

Section: Morphological T2w Tse/fse Sequencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

MRT der Prostata: Empfehlungen zur Vorbereitung und Durchführung

Franiel

Quentin

Mueller‐Lisse³

et al. 2016

Fortschr Röntgenstr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Working Group Uroradiology and Urogenital Diagnosis of the German Roentgen Society has developed uniform recommendations for the preparation and implementation of prostate MRI. In the first part detailed recommendations are given in tabular form regarding 1. anamnestic data before prostate MRI, 2. termination of examinations and preparation of examinations, 3. examination protocol and 4. MRI-guided in-bore biopsy. In the second part, the recommendations are discussed in detail and relevant background information is provided. Key Points: Citation Format

show abstract

Tumorsize dependent detection rate of endorectal MRI of prostate cancer—A histopathologic correlation with whole-mount sections in 70 patients with prostate cancer

Cited by 42 publications

References 25 publications

Comparison of Real-Time Elastography and Multiparametric MRI for Prostate Cancer Detection: A Whole-Mount Step-Section Analysis

Comparison of Real-Time Elastography and Multiparametric MRI for Prostate Cancer Detection: A Whole-Mount Step-Section Analysis

The role of different PI-RADS versions in prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance tomography assessment

MRT der Prostata: Empfehlungen zur Vorbereitung und Durchführung

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About