2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.anchir.2004.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tumeur de Buschke- Lowenstein à localisation anorectale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0
18

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
14
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…Lymph node dissection is not recommended because of low nodal involvement rate and the low metastatic potential of BLT [7] . None of the patients who underwent an APE had lymph node involvement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Lymph node dissection is not recommended because of low nodal involvement rate and the low metastatic potential of BLT [7] . None of the patients who underwent an APE had lymph node involvement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main difficulty is to assess the ideal resection extension to both achieve a complete resection and remain as conservative as possible [8,12] . When the anal sphincter, anal canal, lower rectum or upper rectum is invaded, an APE of the rectum is indicated, as in 4 of our patients who had local recurrence invading the rectum [2,3,7] . Decision between local excision and APE will be mainly based on endoanal US.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations