2017
DOI: 10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20173027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tuberculous cervical lymphadenitis (scrofula): USG, doppler and elastographic evaluation: report of two cases

Abstract: Lymphadenitis is the most generic form of extra pulmonary manifestation of tuberculosis. It is both diagnostic and therapeutic challenge because it mimics various other pathologic processes and yields inconsistent physical laboratory findings. Diagnosis is quite difficult often requiring biopsy. It is also important to differentiate tuberculous from non-tuberculous mycobacterial cervical lymphadenitis as their treatment protocols are different. We are presenting a case report of two patients who presented with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the selective and selective detection of OR in pharmaceuticals and biological samples has great significance for clinical monitoring. Until now, numerous scientific studies related to the determination of OR by different instrumental techniques such as spectrophotometry [3], capillary electrophoresis [4], high‐performance liquid chromatography [5], and gas chromatography‐mass spectroscopy [6] were published. Nevertheless, many of these techniques are time‐consuming and require pricey equipment, highly skilled instrument technicians, and instrument care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the selective and selective detection of OR in pharmaceuticals and biological samples has great significance for clinical monitoring. Until now, numerous scientific studies related to the determination of OR by different instrumental techniques such as spectrophotometry [3], capillary electrophoresis [4], high‐performance liquid chromatography [5], and gas chromatography‐mass spectroscopy [6] were published. Nevertheless, many of these techniques are time‐consuming and require pricey equipment, highly skilled instrument technicians, and instrument care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%