2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11417-019-09290-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trust in the Police in Rural China: a Comparison Between Villagers and Local Officials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study findings also support, to a large extent, the contention of earlier studies (e.g., Elnaghi et al, 2018;Karjaluoto et al, 2018;Loiacono et al, 2002;Menezes et al, 2016;Parasuraman et al, 2005) which found that predominant dissatisfier factors were responsiveness, functionality, and availability (in this study responsivity, interactivity, and serviceability were the corresponding terms used). Even though integrity and reliability (transparency in this study) were found to be the predominant dissatisfiers in recent studies (Badran, 2019;Joseph et al, 2019;Sun et al, 2019), interestingly it was evidenced in this study that integrity and transparency were the predominantly satisfying factors in smart policing service quality dimensions. Model 1 and Model 3 clearly evidence that integrity and serviceability were the dominant factors for users satisfaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 42%
“…The study findings also support, to a large extent, the contention of earlier studies (e.g., Elnaghi et al, 2018;Karjaluoto et al, 2018;Loiacono et al, 2002;Menezes et al, 2016;Parasuraman et al, 2005) which found that predominant dissatisfier factors were responsiveness, functionality, and availability (in this study responsivity, interactivity, and serviceability were the corresponding terms used). Even though integrity and reliability (transparency in this study) were found to be the predominant dissatisfiers in recent studies (Badran, 2019;Joseph et al, 2019;Sun et al, 2019), interestingly it was evidenced in this study that integrity and transparency were the predominantly satisfying factors in smart policing service quality dimensions. Model 1 and Model 3 clearly evidence that integrity and serviceability were the dominant factors for users satisfaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 42%
“…In the US, for instance, IPJ is linked directly and indirectly (via trust in citizens) to external procedural justice among Chicago police officers (Van Craen & Skogan, 2017). In China, IPJ is also predictive of external procedural justice directly or indirectly through moral alignment with supervisors and citizens and trust in citizens (Sun, Han, et al., 2019). A second study found that the relationship between perceived internal accountability and external accountability is mediated by Chinese officers’ job satisfaction and anger (Wu et al., 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%