2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.05.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trigger issues in emerging relationships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…References to Granovetter (1985) have become rather common especially after the re-conceptualisation of embeddedness for use in IMP proposed by Halinen and Törnroos (1998). Yet, with the exception of a recent study by Mandják et al (2016) that employs the original framework from economic sociology to study emerging relationships, in most empirical studies embeddedness is either merely mentioned in passing, or applied by some researchers as a metaphor to phenomena other than social relationships (e.g., Lindfelt and Törnroos, 2006;Andersson et al, 2007;Lind and Dubois, 2008). Thus, this link between IMP and economic sociology remains fragile.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…References to Granovetter (1985) have become rather common especially after the re-conceptualisation of embeddedness for use in IMP proposed by Halinen and Törnroos (1998). Yet, with the exception of a recent study by Mandják et al (2016) that employs the original framework from economic sociology to study emerging relationships, in most empirical studies embeddedness is either merely mentioned in passing, or applied by some researchers as a metaphor to phenomena other than social relationships (e.g., Lindfelt and Törnroos, 2006;Andersson et al, 2007;Lind and Dubois, 2008). Thus, this link between IMP and economic sociology remains fragile.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social cues are specifically impactful in the context of first impressions. The relevance of making a "good" first impression within the context of B2B buying has been acknowledged for decades (Young et al, 1994;Swan et al, 1985;Mandják et al, 2016;Clark and Salaman, 1998;Bergeron et al, 2008). Social cues are used as a source of information to assess the potential seller and to make inferences about the intentions of the selling party (mentalising).…”
Section: Social Cues and First Impressionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of social cues in the B2B buying context will most likely shrink as time goes by. The business development literature has recognised different business development stages that occur as a function of time (Mandják et al, 2016;Dwyer et al, 1987;Medlin, 2004;Ford, 1980). However, the likelihood of diminishing effects of social cues is difficult to concretise, as business development is not a linear process with clear beginnings and ends (Turnbull et al, 1996;Medlin, 2003;Ford and Hakansson, 2005).…”
Section: Variations In the Impact Of Social Cuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They provide a conceptual framework and discuss the different trust building scenarios. Then, they worked on trigger issues in initial stage which boost an emerging relationship and provide a logical framework [73]. Finally, Hennelly and Wong [74] explore the formation of new relationship in nascent industries with high uncertain environment by longitudinal case studies.…”
Section: Network Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%