The behavioural response of the professional buyer on social cues from the vendor and how to measure it

Abstract

Purpose Vendors’ social cues – physical or behavioural hints – have an impact on the professional buyer. However, little is known about that impact. The purpose of this paper is to place knowledge about the impact of social cues that other disciplines acquired in the context of business-to-business (B2B) marketing to contribute constructively to the research agenda. Design/methodology/approach By integrating findings on the processing of social cues and the behavioural response from the disciplines of neuroscience, biology and psychology (specifically the behavioural inhibition system [BIS]/behavioural activation system [BAS]-theory), this paper aims to provide an interdisciplinary perspective on the automatic evaluation of vendors by professional buyers. Findings Social cues are likely to be of substantial value in the (first) encounter between buyer and seller. Positively evaluated social cues create an approach-motivated behavioural intention, whereas negatively evaluated ones create avoidance. This process is probably predominantly mediated by trust and moderated by personality and contextual factors. Research limitations/implications This paper stimulates research about the impact of social cues in a B2B context. While such knowledge would add practical value, this paper also explores possibilities for managers to use neuroscientific techniques to assess and train sales agents. Originality/value The impact of social cues is hardly covered in the B2B marketing literature, but they have an important impact on B2B decision-making. The conceptual framework combines the BIS/BAS theory (approach/avoidance) with the SOR-model (stimulus-organism-response), which is unique to the B2B marketing field.

The effects of environmental factors on B2B e-services purchase: perceived risk and convenience as mediators

“…Figure 1 presents a conceptual model based on the SOR approach. SOR framework comes from the Psychology field (Mehrabian and Russell, 1974) and it has been used to understand decision making in different contexts, such as B2C (Liu et al, 2013) andB2B (van Zeeland andHenseler, 2018). SOR models assume that stimuli are factors that influence the organism (e.g.…”

“…purchase intention of e-services). Our aim is to propose and test a theoretical model to investigate the above mentioned relationships, following the stimulusorganism-response (SOR) framework (Mehrabian and Russell, 1974;van Zeeland and Henseler, 2018). To this end, the authors conducted a survey with 430 managers from MSEs.…”

E-perceptions and Business ‘Mating’: The Communication Effects of the Relative Width of Males’ Faces in Business Portraits

“…But more dominant than text is impression management via visual stimuli. It is in our biological nature to first look at people when forming an impression of them (Barry et al, 2015;van Zeeland and Henseler, 2018a). Faces present a large collection of informative social cues that are used to determine the emotional state, health, traits, and behavioral intentions of the face's owner (Hess et al, 2005;Todorov et al, 2005;Rule and Ambady, 2008;Seidel et al, 2010;Re and Rule, 2015;Stephen et al, 2017).…”

Cognitive dissonance revisited

“…As noted by Javalgi et al (2014), it is equally apparent that many of the differentiating characteristics associated with a B2B selling environment (versus a B2C environment) necessitate that industrial salespeople understand the unique opportunities and obstacles they face. For example, in comparison to sales efforts within a B2C environment, those within a B2B environment tend to involve considerably more interpersonal interaction between the buying and selling parties during the course of a prospective customer's decision-making process, particularly since this process is often spread over many more meetings (Van Zeeland and Henseler, 2018). Furthermore, the stakes are higher, and B2B buyers tend to respond in a more rational manner (Lynch and Chernatony, 2007).…”