2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2012.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tree species classification in the Southern Alps based on the fusion of very high geometrical resolution multispectral/hyperspectral images and LiDAR data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

18
293
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 395 publications
(314 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
18
293
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed vegetationmapping strategy can produce sufficiently high overall accuracies (nearly 80% in both cases) and kappa coefficients (over 0.64 at both sites) for most applications in which the vegetation map provides the essential classification and scaling information. Moreover, the overall accuracy and kappa coefficient obtained from the proposed vegetation-mapping strategy are comparable to most previous supervised vegetation-mapping strategies integrating LiDAR data and multispectral imagery (Bork and Su 2007;Dalponte et al 2012;Cho et al 2012). Although the commission and omission errors for certain vegetation groups were high, they might be caused by misregistration between plot measurements and remotely sensed data (LiDAR data and aerial imagery).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The proposed vegetationmapping strategy can produce sufficiently high overall accuracies (nearly 80% in both cases) and kappa coefficients (over 0.64 at both sites) for most applications in which the vegetation map provides the essential classification and scaling information. Moreover, the overall accuracy and kappa coefficient obtained from the proposed vegetation-mapping strategy are comparable to most previous supervised vegetation-mapping strategies integrating LiDAR data and multispectral imagery (Bork and Su 2007;Dalponte et al 2012;Cho et al 2012). Although the commission and omission errors for certain vegetation groups were high, they might be caused by misregistration between plot measurements and remotely sensed data (LiDAR data and aerial imagery).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Further study is still needed to address how the nonlinear color balancing effect and horizontal accuracy influence the vegetation-mapping accuracy. Moreover, it has been frequently reported that hyperspectral data outperformed multispectral data in recognizing plant species (Adam et al 2010;Xu and Gong 2007), and there have been studies showing that the integration of hyperspectral data and LiDAR data can produce more accurate vegetation maps than the integration of multispectral data and LiDAR data (Dalponte et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, the inclusion of DTM and DSM to create a CHM proved to be critical for the classification of the cicada damage. A similar approach was earlier applied using combinations of high-resolution imagery and Lidar and was found to be successful in many applications [15,[45][46][47]. We believe that the UAV data can be used in many of these situations, being a source of 3D and spectral information from the same source, reducing costs and time of acquisition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Clarification was provided for the 'woodland' classes. This involved the use of height and area rules, the height is easily determinable from LIDAR data and shown by Dalponte et al (2012) to help improve classification accuracy. The use of an area rule allowed individual or clumps or trees to be separated from Woodlands, with these then considered Dune Scrub.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%