2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2017.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of wastewater by mixed bacterial consortium in continuous reactors packed with solid waste

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the use of the immobilized system presents the following advantages over the free one: repeated use, easy separation from the medium, less contamination risk, protection against environmental perturbations ( e.g ., pH, toxic chemicals), and shear damage. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the use of the immobilized system presents the following advantages over the free one: repeated use, easy separation from the medium, less contamination risk, protection against environmental perturbations ( e.g ., pH, toxic chemicals), and shear damage. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results showed that 80% of methylene blue (25 mg l −1 ) and phenol (10 mg l −1 ) were removed in binary batch system by passive adsorption mechanism and intracellular and extracellular enzymatic degradation within 80 min, respectively. Chakraborty and Basu (2017) used East Calcutta Wetlands isolated mixed consortium of bacteria to compare the performance of a counter‐current and a co‐current continuous PBR in degrading phenol. Results showed a 1·43 mg l −1 min rate of phenol degradation and 72·85% of phenol removal efficiency of co‐current continuous PBR.…”
Section: Packed Bed Reactormentioning
confidence: 99%