2005
DOI: 10.2217/14750708.2.2.287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of musculoskeletal infections of the foot in patients with diabetes

Abstract: The incidence of diabetes, diabetic neuro-vasculopathy and as a result, diabetic foot ulceration is a growing problem all over the world. Diabetic foot ulcers are the most common gateways to foot infection. More than 50% of ulcers will become infected at some stage. The authors review the epidemiology, risk factors, pathophysiology, diagnosis, prevention and treatment of diabetic foot infections, including osteomyelitis. Medical and surgical, local and general treatment -including the empirical and evidence-ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 92 publications
(196 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, the proportion of patients with relapsing DFO at the end of 1 year of posttreatment follow-up was 15%, which is similar to that reported by Tice et al (18). The percentage of our patients who required major amputation during followup (10%) was comparable to the results reported by Embil et al (14%) (6), Korda et al (5%) (19), and Margolis et al (6.7%) (20). The overall proportion of patients in whom complete healing was obtained was 85%, with a mean healing time of 15 weeks, slightly shorter than the 26 weeks reported in the study by Kessler et al (21).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In our study, the proportion of patients with relapsing DFO at the end of 1 year of posttreatment follow-up was 15%, which is similar to that reported by Tice et al (18). The percentage of our patients who required major amputation during followup (10%) was comparable to the results reported by Embil et al (14%) (6), Korda et al (5%) (19), and Margolis et al (6.7%) (20). The overall proportion of patients in whom complete healing was obtained was 85%, with a mean healing time of 15 weeks, slightly shorter than the 26 weeks reported in the study by Kessler et al (21).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%