1962
DOI: 10.1177/003693306200701203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment of Hypertension in Out-Patients: Mecamylamine, Bretylium and Guanethidine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1963
1963
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the patients who demonstrated a rise their therapy had to be discontinued in one only, a man who had chronic pyelonephritis. The incidence of raised blood ureas was similar to that found in this department with other anti-hypertensive agents (Fife et al, 1962).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In the patients who demonstrated a rise their therapy had to be discontinued in one only, a man who had chronic pyelonephritis. The incidence of raised blood ureas was similar to that found in this department with other anti-hypertensive agents (Fife et al, 1962).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The variable incidences of side-effects which have been reported (Page et al, 1961 ;Leishman et al, 1961 ;Eagan and Orgain, 1961 ;Fife et al, 1962) are probably related to three factors: variations in (1) the type of patient treated,…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical details are given in Table I, which shows that these features indicate a fair cross-section of patients with severe hypertensive disease. Retinal changes were classified for convenience according to the criteria of Keith, Wagener, and Barker (1939), although this classification has disadvartages, as previously discussed (Turner, 1959). Criteria for the E.C.G.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Criterion was based on symptoms, enzyme changes, ECG changes (Minnesota code)[16,17] and post-mortem findings defined in the WHO coding criteria[18] and the validity of the diagnosis was ensured by intra-observer studies[19]…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%