Treatment of donor sites—Duoderm or Omiderm?

Leicht, P.; Siim, Elsebeth; Sørensen, Bent

doi:10.1016/0305-4179(89)90060-0

Cited by 21 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In comparison with other moist products, in relation to the outcome days to healing , meta‐analysis of two studies significantly favoured the hydrocolloids ( N = 88, WMD −1.45; 95% CI −2.17, −0.74) although it should be noted the two studies lacked homogeneity 15,33 . An additional study favoured the polyurethane product but no indication of significance was given 34…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 96%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The use of moist wound‐healing dressings in the management of split‐thickness skin graft donor sites: a systematic review

Wiechula

2003

Int J of Nursing Practice

129

122

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this systematic review was to determine the best available evidence related to the post-harvest management of split-thickness skin graft (STSG) donor sites. Studies included in the review were those involving patients of any age examining interventions relating to the post-harvest management of STSG donors and were intra-individual or randomized controlled trials. All studies were checked for methodological quality, and data were extracted using a data extraction tool. Many studies were combined in meta-analysis. The present report concerns studies examining moist and non-moist wound-healing dressings. Broad comparisons of moist wound-healing dressings against traditional non-moist dressings favoured moist wound-healing approaches in terms of healing rates, pain and infection. In comparing dressings within and between moist wound-healing dressing groups, the lack of studies of sufficient quality prevented determining a 'best dressing' for STSG donors. Moist wound-healing products have distinct clinical advantages over non-moist products in the management of STSG donors. There is a strong case for further head-to-head studies comparing products within the moist wound-healing group.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 96%

“…The results for the outcomes of pain 34,35 and rates of infection 15,33–35 suggest that hydrocolloids are not particularly superior to other moist products.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The use of moist wound‐healing dressings in the management of split‐thickness skin graft donor sites: a systematic review

Wiechula

2003

Int J of Nursing Practice

129

122

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Five days after the experiment the wounds of the ten animals in each group ous agents have been used; recombinant human growth hormone, keratinocyte sheets and dressings containing polyurethane membranes (Brown et al 1989;Leicht et al 1989;Herndon et al 1990;Fratianne et al 1993). …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor on Wound Healing in a Mouse Model of Burn Trauma

Eroğlu

Agalar

Altuntaş

et al. 2004

Tohoku J. Exp. Med.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The effects of burn trauma and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) treatment on wound healing in a surgical incision model were studied. Sixty adult male mice were used in this study. Under general anesthesia hot water at 97°C was applied for 3 sec to the dorsum of the mice in order to achieve 20% burn wound. After burn trauma, full thickness midline skin incision 2 cm in length was performed on the abdominal wall and then were sutured primarily with 4/0 polypropylene. In Group I only skin incision was performed, group II had skin incision and burn, in group III G-CSF (0.03 BU/30 g) was applied intraperitoneally after burn and skin incision. Breaking strength and 5-hydroxyproline (5-HP) levels of the wounds were calculated 5 and 10 days after the procedure. 5-HP levels and breaking strength values showed statistical difference between groups II-III and I-II (p<0.05). 5-HP levels were lowest in incision and burn group (41.80 μ g/mg). Breaking strength levels were also lowest in the same group (0.12 kg) (p<0.05). These results suggest that third degree burn causes a significant impairment on incisional wound healing and G-CSF ameliorates this impairment.burn; wound; wound healing; G-CSF

show abstract

“…Another ethical consideration for an RCT in a pediatric burns cohort is the documented discomfort patients experience when changing paraffin gauze dressing [10,12,20]. Previous RCTs assessing hydrocolloid dressings in both wound and burn reepithelialization have been restricted by small cohort size, averaging only 37.4 patients (range, 8-72) per study [9][10][11][12]14,15,[21][22][23]. Larger cohort size (248 pediatric burns), despite the retrospective nature of the study, provides a better canvas to assess the significance of results seen and supports results from previous RCTs comparing hydrocolloid and paraffin-based dressings in donor sites.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hydrocolloid dressing in pediatric burns may decrease operative intervention rates

Martin

O’Sullivan

Regan

et al. 2010

Journal of Pediatric Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Treatment of donor sites—Duoderm or Omiderm?

Cited by 21 publications

References 7 publications

The use of moist wound‐healing dressings in the management of split‐thickness skin graft donor sites: a systematic review

The use of moist wound‐healing dressings in the management of split‐thickness skin graft donor sites: a systematic review

Effects of Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor on Wound Healing in a Mouse Model of Burn Trauma

Hydrocolloid dressing in pediatric burns may decrease operative intervention rates

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About