2005
DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000180959.31355.92
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treatment delay and the risk of prolonged status epilepticus

Abstract: Factors contributing to the duration of a single convulsive seizure > 5 minutes were analyzed in 157 children. The medically treated episodes were compared with seizure episodes resolving without treatment (n = 27). Major differences were in age (p = 0.016) and etiology (p = 0.003), and the association between treatment delay and response became significant after 30 minutes when this was analyzed as a single variable (p = 0.003) in Cox regression analysis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
111
2
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
111
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The longer SE continues the less likely it will stop (7). This is the case also in infants and children; Eriksson et al have shown that SE not treated within 30 minutes of onset is more difficult to stop with antiepileptic medication (8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The longer SE continues the less likely it will stop (7). This is the case also in infants and children; Eriksson et al have shown that SE not treated within 30 minutes of onset is more difficult to stop with antiepileptic medication (8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basic and clinical research suggest that longer-duration seizures are more treatmentresistant and are associated with a worse outcome. [17][18][19][20] However, few data are available regarding the time elapsed from SE onset to AED administration in either the prehospital or in-hospital settings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…K. Eriksson concluded that the association between treatment delay and response became significant after 30 minutes when this was analyzed as a single variable (p = 0.003). 8 Those cases had prehospital therapy had poor outcome 6 cases, (26.1%) than the case who didn't receive prehospital therapy 7 cases (10.9%). But this difference is not statistically significant (p >0.05).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%