2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2008.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective treatments of prolonged status epilepticus in developing rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Age (Dube et al, 2001; Priel et al, 1996; Sankar et al, 1997), strain (Xu et al, 2004), pilocarpine dose (Cavalheiro et al, 1987; Priel et al, 1996), presence of lithium (Clifford et al, 1987), electrode implantation techniques (Boast et al, 1976; Loscher et al, 1995), attenuation of SE with benzodiazepine (Hasson et al, 2008) or paraldehyde (Kubova et al, 2005), as well as both timing and type of injury assessment have all been postulated to affect the degree of detectable neuronal loss. Table 2 summarizes some of the parameters used previously to assess for neuronal damage outside the hippocampus in immature animals after LiPC induced SE (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Age (Dube et al, 2001; Priel et al, 1996; Sankar et al, 1997), strain (Xu et al, 2004), pilocarpine dose (Cavalheiro et al, 1987; Priel et al, 1996), presence of lithium (Clifford et al, 1987), electrode implantation techniques (Boast et al, 1976; Loscher et al, 1995), attenuation of SE with benzodiazepine (Hasson et al, 2008) or paraldehyde (Kubova et al, 2005), as well as both timing and type of injury assessment have all been postulated to affect the degree of detectable neuronal loss. Table 2 summarizes some of the parameters used previously to assess for neuronal damage outside the hippocampus in immature animals after LiPC induced SE (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hasson et al. () have also shown that the ability to control prolonged kainate‐ or pilocarpine‐induced SE is age dependent, with total failure of the tested drugs in postnatal (P) day 9 rats, whereas the same treatments were effective in P15 and P21 animals. These models represent a viable screen for the acute effects of putative ASDs as a function of age.…”
Section: Animal Models Of Drug‐resistant Pediatric Epilepsymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such cases, antiseizure effect could be secondary to “insult modification,” and comparisons of its efficacy with other drugs that do not share this mechanism will be difficult without dose–response experiments or testing in models with distinct mechanisms. In addition, the efficacy of a drug may change depending on when it is administered (prior to a seizure, immediately after a brief seizure, or after established status epilepticus),34, 35, 36 and can be altered by multiple factors including vehicle, species, age and sex factors, brain permeability, and pharmacokinetics. Drug effects in disease‐naive conditions may be very different from those during an established disease process, due to changes in the expression or function of key drug targets during the course of a disease 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43.…”
Section: Interpreting Preclinical Therapy Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%