1986
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1986.19-403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Treating Self‐injury: Water Mist Spray Versus Facial Screening or Forced Arm Exercise

Abstract: In three experiments, the effect of water mist spray on self-injurious and collateral behaviors was compared with either facial screening or forced arm exercise. Water mist spray was as effective as facial screening in suppressing face-slapping in Experiment 1. However, it was not as effective as facial screening for self-injurious finger-licking in Experiment 2 or forced arm exercise for excessive ear-rubbing in Experiment 3. These results suggest that while water mist spray is effective, it may be less so th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, applied research findings suggest that a variety of desirable and undesirable side effects can occur within and across individuals. Punishment of problem behavior has been associated with increases in appropriate behavior, such as compliance and toy play (e.g., Koegel, Firestone, Kramme, & Dunlap, 1974; and with decreases in unpunished inappropriate behavior, including aggression and crying (e.g., Bitgood, Crowe, Suarez, & Peters, 1980;Lovaas & Simmons, 1969;Ricketts et al, 1993;Singh, Watson, & Winton, 1986). On the other hand, decreases in appropriate behavior (e.g., toy play, speaking) and increases in unpunished problem behavior (e.g., aggression, emotional reactions, stereotypic behavior) also have been reported (e.g., Bitgood et al, 1980;Duker & Seys, 1996;Foxx & Azrin, 1973;Harris & Wolchick, 1979;Pendergrass, 1971;Singh, Manning, & Angell, 1982;Thompson et al, 1999).…”
Section: Indirect Effects Of Punishmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, applied research findings suggest that a variety of desirable and undesirable side effects can occur within and across individuals. Punishment of problem behavior has been associated with increases in appropriate behavior, such as compliance and toy play (e.g., Koegel, Firestone, Kramme, & Dunlap, 1974; and with decreases in unpunished inappropriate behavior, including aggression and crying (e.g., Bitgood, Crowe, Suarez, & Peters, 1980;Lovaas & Simmons, 1969;Ricketts et al, 1993;Singh, Watson, & Winton, 1986). On the other hand, decreases in appropriate behavior (e.g., toy play, speaking) and increases in unpunished problem behavior (e.g., aggression, emotional reactions, stereotypic behavior) also have been reported (e.g., Bitgood et al, 1980;Duker & Seys, 1996;Foxx & Azrin, 1973;Harris & Wolchick, 1979;Pendergrass, 1971;Singh, Manning, & Angell, 1982;Thompson et al, 1999).…”
Section: Indirect Effects Of Punishmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such procedures have included placing a noxious substance such as lemon juice or pepper sauce in the client's mouth, waving a capsule of ammonia under the client's nose, or administering extremely brief and mild electric shocks. The effects of a fine mist of water applied to the face has also been evaluated (Dorsey et al, 1980;Singh et al, 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Negative punishment occurs when a stimulus is removed contingent on a response and the future likelihood of that responses decreases. Various punishment procedures (e.g., hands down, overcorrection, response cost) have been used successfully for decades to decrease challenging behavior in clinical settings (Baker, Rapp, & Carroll, 2010;Fisher, Piazza, Bowman, Hagopian, & Langdon, 1994;Fisher, Piazza, Bowman, Kurtz et al, 1994;Foxx & Azrin, 1973;Lerman & Toole, 2011;Singh, Watson, & Winton, 1986;Thompson, Iwata, Conners, & Roscoe, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%