1993
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.160.6.8498222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transvaginal color Doppler sonography of adnexal masses: differences in blood flow impedance in benign and malignant lesions.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE.The purpose of this study was to assess the blood flow characteris and malignant lesions was noted, and further work is needed before the validity of these factors is proved.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
28
1
3

Year Published

1994
1994
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(1 reference statement)
2
28
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the size of tumor it was observed that 1 to 3 cm (7.1%), 3.1 to 5 cm (14.3%), 5.1 to 10 cm (60.7%) and more than 10 cm (17.9%) were commonly detected size of the tumor size among the patients. Kawai et al 21 and Hamper et al 22 had almost same observation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Regarding the size of tumor it was observed that 1 to 3 cm (7.1%), 3.1 to 5 cm (14.3%), 5.1 to 10 cm (60.7%) and more than 10 cm (17.9%) were commonly detected size of the tumor size among the patients. Kawai et al 21 and Hamper et al 22 had almost same observation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…It is factually correct that low impedance to blood flow with high velocity is suggestive of malignancy, whereas moderate-tohigh impedance to blood flow is correlated to benign tumors. Resistive indices less than 0.4-0.8 [3,5] and pulsatility indexes less than 1.0 are generally considered to be suspicious for malignancy [3][4][5][6]. In the present study, PI \ 0.8 and RI \ 0.6 were considered for analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results have been controversial. Some authors have found this technique useful 2 -10 , whereas others have not [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] . Some factors put forward to explain these conflicting results include differences in sonographers' experience, different sensitivity in ultrasound machines and the lack of standarization of Doppler measurements 27 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some authors have found this technique useful [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] , others have questioned these results [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%