1993
DOI: 10.1159/000474614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transurethral Microwave Thermotherapy in the Treatment of Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(11 reference statements)
1
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Three versions of the operating software have been used in general clinical trials. The standard operating soft ware for the Prostatron is version 2.0, and worldwide, re markably similar clinical results have been reported from several centres [11][12][13][14]. Most studies use the MadsenIversen physician-guided symptom score (MSS) which ranges from 0 to 27.…”
Section: Prostasoft 20 Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Three versions of the operating software have been used in general clinical trials. The standard operating soft ware for the Prostatron is version 2.0, and worldwide, re markably similar clinical results have been reported from several centres [11][12][13][14]. Most studies use the MadsenIversen physician-guided symptom score (MSS) which ranges from 0 to 27.…”
Section: Prostasoft 20 Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In a study by Dahlstrand et al of 39 patients treated with TUMT, 4 pa tients were considered non-responders and, therefore, un derwent TURP [18]. Blute et al presented the results of 150 patients with a follow-up of 1 year, and 19 patients were regarded as non-responders [11], In contrast to these results, Van Cauwelaert et al [19] and Tubaro et al [13] show subjective and objective improvement, while the re treatment rate is acceptably low. However, the durability of response needs a longer follow-up.…”
Section: Durability Of Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are not comparable to ours, as our group was mainly composed of patients with moderate to severe 'compressive' BPH obstruction, with a mean detrusor opening pressure of 64.27 cm H2O. As transurethral resection of the prostate seems to yield less favorable results in patients with low voiding pressure (detrusor opening pressure 25-40 cm H2O) [25], the re sults of these authors [13,18], if confirmed, suggest that TUMT could represent an effective alternative in this group. Hofner et al [21] report good results of TUMT in diminishing subjective symptoms and in improving the flow rates, but no objective relief of outflow obstruction after 3 months of follow-up, which seems a brief interval.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Reported complications after TUMT have so far been few [1,2]. Although the present patient’s prostate was small he was treated using TUMT because the length of the prostate exceeded the recommended minimum of 25 mm.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 89%