2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4618-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: long-term review from a single center

Abstract: SILC via traditional devices is feasible and safe with acceptable postoperative incidence rate in the long run. Patients with older age or female gender, who have no severe systemic diseases, tend to benefit more from the surgical intervention.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since SPLC was first introduced in the 1990s,[ 6 19 ] it has gained attention as an alternative minimally invasive surgery compared to conventional three-port cholecystectomy. Even short learning curve[ 20 21 ] and many advantages[ 8 9 10 12 13 ] are associated with this procedure, SPLC has been prone to higher incidences of post-operative complications. Many systemic reviews of complications have been published[ 5 13 22 ] and controversy remains relative to safety and feasibility issues compared to CLC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since SPLC was first introduced in the 1990s,[ 6 19 ] it has gained attention as an alternative minimally invasive surgery compared to conventional three-port cholecystectomy. Even short learning curve[ 20 21 ] and many advantages[ 8 9 10 12 13 ] are associated with this procedure, SPLC has been prone to higher incidences of post-operative complications. Many systemic reviews of complications have been published[ 5 13 22 ] and controversy remains relative to safety and feasibility issues compared to CLC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 28 29 30 ] The incidence of wound infection in this study (2.7%) is comparable to or even lower than that published in other research papers (range, 1.05–14.3). [ 13 25 28 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation