1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-0248(98)00177-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transmission electron microscopy study of the interface of Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ thin films on (110) oriented SrTiO3 substrates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example for our films grown on NGO phase and orientation evolution with growth temperature is presented in Fig. The reason for formation of several phases/orientations were investigated for the non c-axis Bi-22 1 2 films and can be summarized as follows: substrate non-uniformity (domains with different roughness giving thermodynamically preferred growth orientations) [4], mismatch strain between film and substrate [4], low difference in the free energy between Bi-2201, Bi-2212 and Bi-2223 phases [4], orientation and type of the substrate resulting in different substrate-film bonding at interface and therefore inducing homo-(when strong ionic bonds S-F form) or hetero-epitaxial (when weak Van der Waals bonds S-F form) growth [4], the thermodynamic stability (anisotropic growth kinetics) and epitaxy at the F-S interface combined with the half-unit cell stability of the HTS (understood from the viewpoint of the electrical neutrality) that is different when the interface layer is Bi-O sheet or the perovskite layer which consist of Sr, Ca and Cu [7]. The growth temperatures indicated here are to some extent relative because from one experiment, or MOCVD equipment to another the arrangements are not perfectly identical.…”
Section: Bi-2223 Thin Films Grown On Flat Substratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example for our films grown on NGO phase and orientation evolution with growth temperature is presented in Fig. The reason for formation of several phases/orientations were investigated for the non c-axis Bi-22 1 2 films and can be summarized as follows: substrate non-uniformity (domains with different roughness giving thermodynamically preferred growth orientations) [4], mismatch strain between film and substrate [4], low difference in the free energy between Bi-2201, Bi-2212 and Bi-2223 phases [4], orientation and type of the substrate resulting in different substrate-film bonding at interface and therefore inducing homo-(when strong ionic bonds S-F form) or hetero-epitaxial (when weak Van der Waals bonds S-F form) growth [4], the thermodynamic stability (anisotropic growth kinetics) and epitaxy at the F-S interface combined with the half-unit cell stability of the HTS (understood from the viewpoint of the electrical neutrality) that is different when the interface layer is Bi-O sheet or the perovskite layer which consist of Sr, Ca and Cu [7]. The growth temperatures indicated here are to some extent relative because from one experiment, or MOCVD equipment to another the arrangements are not perfectly identical.…”
Section: Bi-2223 Thin Films Grown On Flat Substratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 Furthermore, the STO buffer layer deposited on an Si͑110͒ plane, which is the sidewall of V-grooves, can provide a different growth orientation of superconductor films to improve the potential application. 6 The anisotropic wet etching technique has been widely employed in the formation of silicon patterns. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Using KOH-based aqueous solution, a Si͑111͒ plane is usually formed due to its lowest etching rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%