2018
DOI: 10.1111/hex.12842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translation, transcultural adaptation, and validation of two questionnaires on shared decision making

Abstract: Objective To translate, transcultural adapt, and validate the “CollaboRATE” measure and the “Ask 3 Questions” intervention in Argentina, allowing us to quantify the degree of use and implementation of shared decision making (SDM). Design Cross‐sectional study. Setting and Participants Data were collected in an academic hospital in Buenos Aires. Physician–patient pairs were invited to participate following their scheduled outpatient visits. Measurements Two processes were carried out as follows: (a) The transla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high internal consistency reported in the present study is similar to those previously reported by Rosenberg et al (2017) ; Bravo et al (2018) ; Hurley et al (2019) , and Ruiz Yanzi et al (2019) . Our results confirmed the unidimensional construct of the questionnaire, and are consistent with the hypothesized factor reported in the original study ( Elwyn et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The high internal consistency reported in the present study is similar to those previously reported by Rosenberg et al (2017) ; Bravo et al (2018) ; Hurley et al (2019) , and Ruiz Yanzi et al (2019) . Our results confirmed the unidimensional construct of the questionnaire, and are consistent with the hypothesized factor reported in the original study ( Elwyn et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Another recent Swedish study conducted among patients with obstructive sleep apnea ( N = 193) reported that the CollaboRATE showed good evidence of validity and reliability to measure SDM in addition to accessible time completion (less than 30 seconds) ( Brostrom, Pakpour, Nilsen, Hedberg, & Ulander, 2019 ). A validation study conducted in Argentina among adults ( N = 56) receiving treatment in family medicine and primary care centers ( N = 30), and specialists ( N = 26) found that the CollaboRATE presented adequate evidences of reliability and criterion validity ( Ruiz Yanzi et al, 2019 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One recently published study assessing SDM in the community mental health setting did show a high internal consistency of the CollaboRATE score [ 9 ]. The score did also show adequate reliability and validity when translated in other languages such as Spanish [ 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a good clinical decision-making model, SDM reflects the patient-centered approach, which is more conducive to ensuring individualized diagnosis and treatment, reducing medical risks and improving patient compliance and therapeutic effects (2,3,(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15) than the traditional informational model (in which physicians inform patients of the pros and cons of the available treatment options and let the patients make the final decision alone) and the paternalistic model (in which physicians make all decisions on behalf of the patients). Therefore, SDM has received increasing attention from both physicians and patients in various specialties in many countries including psychiatrists (16,17).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%