2005
DOI: 10.1080/03637750500111872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transforming Resistance, Broadening Our Boundaries: Critical Organizational Communication Meets Globalization from Below

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
70
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
70
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This might mean missing out on potentially powerful forms of more collective and connected modes of emancipation. It could also lead to a situation where we miss the more universal forms of struggle against managerialism because we are so focused on detailing the minutiae of micro-emancipations in particular localities (Ganesh et al, 2005). The result is that the researcher develops a kind of myopic obsession with differences and locality without considering any important patterns of similarities.…”
Section: Micro-emancipationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This might mean missing out on potentially powerful forms of more collective and connected modes of emancipation. It could also lead to a situation where we miss the more universal forms of struggle against managerialism because we are so focused on detailing the minutiae of micro-emancipations in particular localities (Ganesh et al, 2005). The result is that the researcher develops a kind of myopic obsession with differences and locality without considering any important patterns of similarities.…”
Section: Micro-emancipationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recently we have witnessed some important concerns being raised about this research agenda. In particular, some are concerned that it has constrained how we think about forms of emancipation, creating a myopic focus on smallscale struggles and fundamentally ignoring many of the broader social struggles that challenge management (Ganesh, Zoller and Cheney, 2005). In addition, they have pointed out that a simple division between macro-emancipation and micro-emancipation often ignores many of the important imbrications between the two (Taylor and Bain, 2003;Fleming and Spicer, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that it is "hard to get a sense of how active agential selves 'make a difference' through 'playing' with discursive practices" (Newton 1998: 425-6). Even when Foucauldian researchers have endeavoured to register how 'active agential selves' play with a discourse, they have often focused on individual or at best small group struggles, at the expense of broader collective struggles (Ganesh et al 2005). The result is that Foucauldian approaches are able to tell us a lot about specific micro-political workplace struggles, but they have often side-stepped the collective struggles against the discourses of management in the wider realms of society (Contu 2002;Böhm 2006).…”
Section: Resistance As Micro-politicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A consciência que hoje se tem da globalização pode ser atribuída em parte ao aumento de interconexão tecnológica e cultural entre as nações e à diminuição das fronteiras, que contribuíram para a expansão do comércio mundial, o que por fim representou as melhores "rotas" para o desenvolvimento econômico global Zoller;Cheney, 2005). Esse cenário levou nações e organizações a estabelecerem acordos internacionais e atuarem na esfera dos negócios nesse mundo mais globalizado.…”
Section: Interculturalidade Nas Organizaçõesunclassified
“…Além disso, as organizações praticamente têm um papel ativo em todas essas esferas, seja como agentes adotando uma perspectiva ou negociando o desenvolvimento sustentável; seja cruzando fronteiras das nações perfazendo negócios; ou como um espaço intercultural para os sujeitos, sendo que essa sua importância é evidenciada na interculturalidade (Barbosa;Veloso, 2007e 2009Zoller;Cheney, 2005) e na sustentabilidade (Vos, 2011;Barkemeyer et al, 2011), justamente por ocupar uma posição-chave dentro das esferas econômica, política, social e ambiental.…”
Section: Organizações Interculturais Em Uma Perspectiva Sustentávelunclassified