Transformation of complex movements from policy to practice – a discourse analysis of Swedish physical education teachers’ concepts of moving

Abstract

Background: How teachers enact policy has been of significant interest to educational scholars. In physical education research, scholars have identified several factors affecting the enactment of policy. These factors include but are not limited to: structural support available for teachers, provision of professional development opportunities, the nature of the policy, and the educational philosophies of the teachers. A recurring conclusion drawn in this scholarship is that official documentation and teachers' work often diverge, sometimes in profound ways. Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate how physical education teachers in Sweden describe their enactment of policy regarding the concept complex movement, which features in the latest Swedish curriculum. Methods: Interview data were generated with six specialist physical education teachers. Three questions guided the interviews: What is complex movement? What is not complex movement? And, can you give examples from your teaching of complex movement? Data were analyzed using a discourse analytic framework. Meaning was understood as a production of dialectical relationships between individuals and social practices. Two key concepts were utilized: intertextuality, which refers to the condition whereby all communicative events, not merely utterances, draw on earlier communication events, and interdiscursivity, which refers to discursive practices in which discourse types are combined in new and complex ways. Results: We identified three discourses regarding the teachers' enactment of policy: (1) Complex movement as individual difficulty, (2) Complex movement as composite movements, and (3) Complex movement as situational adaptation. Several features were common to all three discourses: they were all related to issues of assessment; they suggested that complex movement is something students should be able to show or perform, and; they left open room for practically any activity done in physical education to be considered complex. Discussion: Three issues are addressed in the Discussion. The first concerns the intertextual nature of the teachers' statements and how the statements relate to policy and research. The second concerns the way that knowledge, and specifically movement knowledge, becomes problematic in the teachers' statements about complex movement. The third concerns more broadly the language used to describe the relationship between policy and practice. Conclusions: We propose that modest levels of overlap between teachers' ARTICLE HISTORY

Fit for the job? How corporeal expectations shape physical education teachers’ understandings of content, pedagogy, and the purposes of physical education

“…Instead, Swedish PE focuses on trying out different activities in non-competitive environments, joy of movement, being physically active and social relations (Larsson and Karlefors 2015; Larsson and Quennerstedt 2016). Since the last curriculum reform in 2011, there has also been a strong focus on assessment and grades which has put other aspects such as movement complexity in the foreground (Janemalm, Barker, and Quennerstedt 2020;Svennberg 2017).…”

‘Fighting like a girl ’: qualitative analysis of the gendered movement learning in the Spanish Olympic karate team

“…It is important to note this because the practice of sports, with its tendency to think of the body as a machine, can distance athletes from subjective body perception, which can also contribute to the difficulty of mastering complex techniques. In the case of karateka women, we wonder if what sensei report regarding their difficulty is related to a type of individual unconsciousness of potentiality or social belief of incapacity (Roth and Basow 2004); or whether it would be some kind of transmission failure in teaching complex movements (Janemalm, Barker, and Quennerstedt 2020), perhaps in a too theoretical way, or the opposite, the absence of concepts and knowledge of female training methods, taking into account physiology, biomechanics, anatomy of women. In this regard, an athlete and a coach make contributions: (I miss) That they understand and be able to have the confidence to talk about menstruation, because I believe that many times you yourself notice that physiologically (…) there are different requirements.…”

“…There is an extensive literature on movement learning in physical education (for example, Nyberg, Barker, and Larsson 2021;Janemalm, Barker, and Quennerstedt 2020;Larsson 2021), as well as studies proposing better ways of teaching students complex movement skills (Chróinín, Fletcher, and O'Sullivan 2018;Light and Clarke 2021). To some extent, analogous research has been carried out in a select set of sports, such as rugby (Llobet-Martí, López-Ros, and Vila 2017), action sports (Ellmer and Rynne 2021), cricket (Lascu et al 2020), football (Mason, Farrow, and Hattie 2020) and dance (Mattsson and Larsson 2021).…”

Physical Education Teachers and Competing Obesity Discourses: An Examination of Emerging Professional Identities

“…Instead, Swedish physical education focuses more on trying out different activities in noncompetitive environments, experiencing joy of movement, being physically active, and enhancing social relations (Larsson & Karlefors, 2015;Larsson & Quennerstedt, 2016). Since the last curriculum reform in 2011, there has also been a strong focus on assessment and grades, which has put aspects of movement complexity in a variety of activities in the foreground (Janemalm, Barker, & Quennerstedt, 2020;Svennberg, 2017).…”