2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2020.106605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transformation mechanisms of organic S/N/O compounds during microwave pyrolysis of oil shale: A comparative research with conventional pyrolysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The OP produced the highest amount of H 2 (45vol%), followed by PA, SRF, and WW (36.3 and 30vol%, respectively). Lower H 2 production than SSWs was noted to LP at 24vol% and reed at 13vol% WW, SRF, and PA produced a similar amount of CO compared to SSW (17,18, and 19vol% compared to 21 and 20vol% for SSSW and DSSW, respectively). LP and reed produced the highest amounts of CO (27 and 31vol%) and the lowest value of CO was obtained for OP at 15vol%.…”
Section: H 2 O Gasificationmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The OP produced the highest amount of H 2 (45vol%), followed by PA, SRF, and WW (36.3 and 30vol%, respectively). Lower H 2 production than SSWs was noted to LP at 24vol% and reed at 13vol% WW, SRF, and PA produced a similar amount of CO compared to SSW (17,18, and 19vol% compared to 21 and 20vol% for SSSW and DSSW, respectively). LP and reed produced the highest amounts of CO (27 and 31vol%) and the lowest value of CO was obtained for OP at 15vol%.…”
Section: H 2 O Gasificationmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The use of combustion processes is then again related to harmful pollutants, whereas the use of air/O 2 as gasifying agents promotes the formation of dioxins and furans. In view of it, the use of other substances as gasifying agents, like steam [11,12] and/or CO 2 [13,14] looks very attractive, especially when the heat required for gasification is obtained by environmentally clean technologies (solar [15], microwave (MW) [16,17], plasma [18,19], etc.) different from combustion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pyrolysis temperature had obvious effects on the heteroatom composition and their relative abundance. He et al 251 compared molecular composition of heteroatoms in shale oils from microwave pyrolysis and conventional pyrolysis. The microwave pyrolysis promoted heteroatoms transform into chars and/or gases, reducing contents in shale oils.…”
Section: Characterization Of Alternative Fuelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microwave exposure represents a good alternative for coal modification due to the advantages of instantaneous penetration, selective heating, feasible control, and environmental friendliness. 25 Currently, microwave exposure has been preliminarily applied in the fields of coal dehydration, 26−28 coal/oil desulfurization, 29,30 hard rock fracturing, 31,32 aid grinding, 33,34 coal/biowaste pyrolysis, 35,36 coking, 37,38 oil shale exploitation, 39,40 and heavy oil thermal recovery. 41,42 Microwaves, as ultrahigh-frequency electromagnetic waves (3 × 10 8 to 3 × 10 12 Hz) that consist of magnetic and electric fields perpendicular to each other, can cause high-frequency vibrations (billions for microwaves with a frequency of 2.45 × 10 9 Hz) and friction of polar molecules or free electrons within their penetration range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microwave exposure represents a good alternative for coal modification due to the advantages of instantaneous penetration, selective heating, feasible control, and environmental friendliness . Currently, microwave exposure has been preliminarily applied in the fields of coal dehydration, coal/oil desulfurization, , hard rock fracturing, , aid grinding, , coal/biowaste pyrolysis, , coking, , oil shale exploitation, , and heavy oil thermal recovery. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%