2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2020.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcultural adaptation and validation of a French version of the Physical Activity Scale for Individuals with Physical Disabilities (PASIPD-Fr)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings showed that the P-PASIPD's total score has an acceptable internal consistency. This finding is similar to the Dutch [18], Turkish [21], French [22], and Bahasa Malaysian [20] versions. However, the range of the Cronbach α for PASIPD items in the original English [17], Canadian [19], Dutch [18], Bahasa Malaysian [20], and Turkish [21] versions were higher than the Persian version (0.37-0.65, 0.49-0.72, 0.59-0.64, 0.60-0.69, 0.35-0.38, and 0.24-0.66, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our findings showed that the P-PASIPD's total score has an acceptable internal consistency. This finding is similar to the Dutch [18], Turkish [21], French [22], and Bahasa Malaysian [20] versions. However, the range of the Cronbach α for PASIPD items in the original English [17], Canadian [19], Dutch [18], Bahasa Malaysian [20], and Turkish [21] versions were higher than the Persian version (0.37-0.65, 0.49-0.72, 0.59-0.64, 0.60-0.69, 0.35-0.38, and 0.24-0.66, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The PASIPD is applied for individuals with spinal cord injury, cerebral palsy, low-back pain, whiplash injury, lower limb amputation, and Parkinson disease. Also, its psychometric characteristics have been assessed in different languages [18][19][20][21][22]. The results of these studies revealed that the PA-SIPD has acceptable reliability and validity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the moderately good correlation between the self-reported PAL and MET values (r = 0.57) indicate that the results are acceptable mediums for study analysis. The PASIPD questionnaire has been reported to provide low-to-good internal consistency (ICC = 0.20-0.87), poor-to-moderate correlation with PAL (r = 0.22-0.51), and comparisons with wearable devices such as accelerometers [16,[44][45][46][47][48][49][50]. However, such poor-to-moderate measures of internal consistency and correlations are also apparent in other forms of PA questionnaires, such as the well-known International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) [51].…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%