2023
DOI: 10.1123/japa.2021-0261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of the Physical Activity Scale for Individuals With Physical Disabilities for Brazilian Individuals With Parkinson’s Disease

Abstract: The Physical Activity Scale for Individuals with Physical Disabilities (PASIPD) is not available to Portuguese-Brazil. This study translates, cross-culturally adapts, and validates the PASIPD for Brazilian individuals with Parkinson’s disease. The translation process followed guidelines: initial translation, synthesis, back translation, expert committee, and pretest. The validation and reliability processes were conducted with 40 individuals (15 men and 25 women) with Parkinson’s disease. Concurrent validity w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the moderately good correlation between the self-reported PAL and MET values (r = 0.57) indicate that the results are acceptable mediums for study analysis. The PASIPD questionnaire has been reported to provide low-to-good internal consistency (ICC = 0.20-0.87), poor-to-moderate correlation with PAL (r = 0.22-0.51), and comparisons with wearable devices such as accelerometers [16,[44][45][46][47][48][49][50]. However, such poor-to-moderate measures of internal consistency and correlations are also apparent in other forms of PA questionnaires, such as the well-known International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) [51].…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the moderately good correlation between the self-reported PAL and MET values (r = 0.57) indicate that the results are acceptable mediums for study analysis. The PASIPD questionnaire has been reported to provide low-to-good internal consistency (ICC = 0.20-0.87), poor-to-moderate correlation with PAL (r = 0.22-0.51), and comparisons with wearable devices such as accelerometers [16,[44][45][46][47][48][49][50]. However, such poor-to-moderate measures of internal consistency and correlations are also apparent in other forms of PA questionnaires, such as the well-known International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) [51].…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%