2009
DOI: 10.1089/lap.2008.0197.supp
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transaxillary Totally Endoscopic Robot-Assisted Ansa Cervicalis to Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Reinnervation for Repair of Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis

Abstract: Pediatric unilateral vocal-fold paralysis represents a source of significant morbidity, for which treatment options are quite limited. Conventional management strategies suitable for adults are not appropriate for the developing larynx. In this study, we report the first experience with minimally invasive laryngeal reinnervation. While open techniques for pediatric recurrent laryngeal nerve reinnervation have been performed, these require large, visible incisions, which limit the appeal of this technique. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(18 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We speculate that younger patients have greater neuroregenerative potential than older patients, and thus achieved a better reinnervation result; and that they may also have a greater ability to adapt their phonatory motor patterns to the changes produced by UVFP and subsequent reinnervation. Smith et al21 reported excellent results with ansa‐RLN reinnervation in a group of 12‐ to 21‐year‐olds; the procedure has even been performed with a transaxillary, robotic‐assisted approach in children 22. The ML procedure does not require nerve healing and might be expected to give similar results in all age groups, as found in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…We speculate that younger patients have greater neuroregenerative potential than older patients, and thus achieved a better reinnervation result; and that they may also have a greater ability to adapt their phonatory motor patterns to the changes produced by UVFP and subsequent reinnervation. Smith et al21 reported excellent results with ansa‐RLN reinnervation in a group of 12‐ to 21‐year‐olds; the procedure has even been performed with a transaxillary, robotic‐assisted approach in children 22. The ML procedure does not require nerve healing and might be expected to give similar results in all age groups, as found in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…), reinnervation of posterior cricoarytenoid for bilateral vocal fold paralysis, being review articles, and/or lack of a description of clinical management. After a review of the remaining 20 articles, 10 additional reports were excluded because of duplicate patients, 22–28 a lack of preoperative values, 29 exclusive focus on two children, 15 and focus on a novel approach used on only two patients 30 . From the 284 references of the 10 remaining articles, 31–40 an additional four publications 13,41–43 were identified and included after a manual crosscheck of the bibliography.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a review of the remaining 20 articles, 10 additional reports were excluded because of duplicate patients, [22][23][24][25][26][27][28] a lack of preoperative values, 29 exclusive focus on two children, 15 and focus on a novel approach used on only two patients. 30 From the 284 references of the 10 remaining articles, [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] an additional four publications 13,[41][42][43] were identified and included after a manual crosscheck of the bibliography. Unpublished reports were not considered (Fig 1).…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laryngeal reinnervation procedure might be the ideal solution for vocal fold medialization via rehabilitation of the tone of the adductor muscles without any foreign body implantation. This surgical method still has not achieved general acceptance, although younger patients with higher neuroregenerative potential could benefit from this approach 40–45 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%