2009
DOI: 10.1027/0044-3409.217.4.205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traditional Bullying and Cyberbullying

Abstract: We investigated the co-occurrence of traditional bullying, cyberbullying, traditional victimization, and cybervictimization, and analyzed whether students belonging to particular groups of bullies (e.g., traditional, cyber, or both), victims (e.g., traditional, cyber, or both), and bully-victims differed regarding adjustment. Seven hundred sixty-one adolescents (49% boys) aged 14–19 years (M = 15.6 years) were surveyed. More students than expected by chance were totally uninvolved, more students were tradition… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
82
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 245 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
11
82
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…P. K. found that many victims of cyberbullying were also victims of traditional bullying (see also Gradinger, Strohmeier, & Spiel, 2009;Kowalski, Morgan, & Limber, 2012;Privitera & Campbell, 2009;Kessel Schneider, O'Donnell, Stueve, & Coulter, 2012), and they found a similar correspondence between perpetrators of cyberbullying and perpetrators of traditional bullying. Additionally, Hinduja and Patchin (2008) found that individuals who had perpetrated cyberbullying within the previous 6 months were 2.5 times more likely to also perpetrate traditional bullying than were those who had not been involved with cyberbullying.…”
Section: Cyberbullying Versus Traditional Bullyingmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…P. K. found that many victims of cyberbullying were also victims of traditional bullying (see also Gradinger, Strohmeier, & Spiel, 2009;Kowalski, Morgan, & Limber, 2012;Privitera & Campbell, 2009;Kessel Schneider, O'Donnell, Stueve, & Coulter, 2012), and they found a similar correspondence between perpetrators of cyberbullying and perpetrators of traditional bullying. Additionally, Hinduja and Patchin (2008) found that individuals who had perpetrated cyberbullying within the previous 6 months were 2.5 times more likely to also perpetrate traditional bullying than were those who had not been involved with cyberbullying.…”
Section: Cyberbullying Versus Traditional Bullyingmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Gender differences are often not reported; Gradinger, Strohmeier, and Spiel, 2009) looked at gender differences and reported that boys are more likely than girls to be school bullies and cyberbullies.…”
Section: Bullying In Schoolmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…But, to our knowledge, only a handful of studies have compared the groups of children directly involved in cyberbullying (Gradinger et al, 2009;Vandebosch & van Cleemput, 2008. But, to our knowledge, only a handful of studies have compared the groups of children directly involved in cyberbullying (Gradinger et al, 2009;Vandebosch & van Cleemput, 2008.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Bullies Victims and Bully-victims In Rementioning
confidence: 99%